Hello all,
I thought I'd share my difference between my timed and blind review score. I apologize if this has been brought up in previous discussion threads. I have finished most of the curriculum and plan on taking the test in June 2016.
I took PT 56 (Dec 2008) and my timed score was a 152 and my BR was a 173. To me, this is a huge difference and I honestly thought my BR was a fluke. I was not expecting to see that big of a jump. I was wondering if anyone else has been in my position and how they were able to close the gap between their timed and blind review scores. Any strategies/anecdotes would be helpful!
Also, what lessons should I take from these scores? Does the blind review mean it is possible for me to hit a 170+? And as a person working a full time job (I study after work and on weekends), is it possible to improve that quickly by June?
Thanks again for your advice and thoughts!
Comments
Several more PT's, and paying attention to what's bringing your timed scores down should help you devise a strategy to bridge the gap (maybe you spend too much time on time sync questions, maybe you don't trust your instinct enough and overthink answers, whatever it is for you specifically).
If your BR scores are consistently high, it does bode well for a score, but it's not a guarantee - you still need to work on performing under pressure, but it shows pretty solid command of the material, which puts you in a good position to improve with practice.
Hope to hear back from you in a few weeks reporting that your BR scores are still nice and high and you have an idea of what's lowering your timed scores.
I acknowledge that I need more data but going forward should I only BR my circled questions? Thanks.
For over confidence errors, you have to do some deeper analysis than just the mechanics of the question (why did you not circle this questions? What led you to think you were so certain?)
If you’re getting a BR of 175 even after only blind reviewing the circled questions, then you’re probably suffering from under confidence, which probably means you need to go back to the curriculum and master the fundamentals (grammar, argument, forms, abstraction, etc...) and drill between PTs until you know that stuff cold.
So anyway, that was my thinking. I believe it aligns with what you said.
and yes @Alejandro there is no magic bullet. for some of us that needs to be hammered in a few times before it sticks.
It's important that you're not creating two sets of logical reasoning strategies for yourself. I noticed that when I took PTs, I would freak out about the time element and not take the time through to eliminate ACs concretely - I relied too much on my gut feeling. Yet, when I BR'ed (and I BR'ed clean copies of sections), I would rarely rely on my gut feeling to get an answer. Sure enough, my BR was better because it was the true practice of applying the fundamentals while my PT scores was one step removed from guessing.