Brace yourselves guys - we just got this email from the LSAC:
"In addition to the Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, and Analytical Reasoning (LG) sections the LSAC is add a new section call Critical Analysis. This section tests students ability to read evidence, arguments, and declarations and critically analyze the credibility of the material. This move is partially in response to increasing complaints by law school professors who feel that law students fail to think critically about what they hear and read.
"98% of my students will believe anything I say without even thinking about it for one second. It makes me sick to my stomach!", laments Prof. Laura Norder, who teaches second year Evidence at Princeton Law School."
Comments
Seemed plausible until it said LSAC was responding to the concerns of professors. Then I was like, okay, this has to be a joke. I didn’t know what day it was, so I was still confused as to why.
You got me this time @"J.Y. Ping" better sleep with one eye open.
PS. Please don't give LSAC any ideas and delete this....soon....
I am further concerned, however, that I didn't catch the Princeton matter.