Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Official June LSAT Discussion Thread

inactiveinactive Alum Member
edited June 2016 in June 2016 LSAT 12637 karma
Hey guys! Here's the official June LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the June 2016 LSAT here!

Here's some ground rules, taken from my usual sticky:

We know that everyone will be excited to discuss what was on the June '16 LSAT, but mentioning specifics about the test (e.g., "I got B for question 6" or "the 3rd LG was sequencing") can get both us and you in a lot of trouble with LSAC. Saying that the test was hard/easy without going into detail is okay, but anything more specific is not okay. LSAC monitors this forum.

If you're unsure what may be too specific, feel free to PM me with what you'd like to post.

The only exception is you can say which sections were real or experimental. For example, the LG with "flowers" was experimental. That's okay.

TL;DR: PLEASE don't talk specifics about June's LSAT!

Here's where you can see the current Real/Experimental Sections:
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/6923/june-2016-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords

Have fun discussing!
LSAT Difficulty
  1. How difficult do you think the June LSAT was?116 votes
    1. Very difficult. It was a real challenge.
      34.48%
    2. As difficult as any other LSAT. I was well prepared.
      56.03%
    3. Not difficult at all. It was underwhelming.
        9.48%
«1345

Comments

  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    Thread opened for the June LSAT! Feel free to discuss (while abiding by the above rules) here. :)
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
  • Sheri123Sheri123 Alum Member
    1196 karma
    @"Dillon A. Wright" that link shows closed when you go to it & refers back to this link.
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @Sheri123 said:
    @"Dillon A. Wright" that link shows closed when you go to it & refers back to this link.
    That's the point! Discussion is made here, the closed link is for the sections that we know about.
  • june62016goalsjune62016goals Legacy Member
    69 karma
    rc: blues/ griods; overfishing
    Was this experimental or real?
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @june62016goals said:
    blues/ griods
    Is that last one grids or golds?
  • gaohaoyuanddgaohaoyuandd Member
    edited June 2016 29 karma
    Pretty sure this rcs experimental.
    I had two games, one fairly easy and the other above average hard.
    Any thought?
  • StopLawyingStopLawying Alum Member
    821 karma
    Definitely experimental because I didn't have that.
  • june62016goalsjune62016goals Legacy Member
    edited June 2016 69 karma
    Honestly not sure what the actual word was. It was the passage that compared blues musicians with another g musician from another society. It was spelled weird so I just made up the closest to what I remember

    Admin edit: Edited slightly to abide by rules.
  • gaohaoyuanddgaohaoyuandd Member
    29 karma
    Trust me bro, u this ones experimental. My comparative reading wasn't about blues but legal matters
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    Did anyone else get Overfishing / Farming Fish for RC? Trying to figure out if real or experimental.
  • gaohaoyuanddgaohaoyuandd Member
    29 karma
    Verdict: Experimental
    I didn't have it
  • LARamsNationLARamsNation Legacy Member
    592 karma
    sitting on the edge of my seat waiting for the verdict! How was it?!
  • Ron SwansonRon Swanson Alum Member Inactive ⭐
    edited June 2016 1650 karma
    RC was nullification, sociohistography, tablets/tokens, Ozone

    I had 1 RC section
  • Nicole HopkinsNicole Hopkins Alum Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐
    4344 karma
    @"Dillon A. Wright" said:
    Overfishing / Farming Fish for RC?
    that one was experimental
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @"Ron Swanson" said:
    RC was nullification, sociohistography, tablets/tokens, Ozone
    Assume you had the real RC?
  • Ron SwansonRon Swanson Alum Member Inactive ⭐
    1650 karma
    I had an experimental LR...does a question about Brabblers ring bells for anyone?

    Basically looking for keywords to identify my experimental. One of the LR sections was devastating, the other 2 were run of the mill LSAT. Are experimental sections sometimes more difficult? (Please say yes)
  • gaohaoyuanddgaohaoyuandd Member
    29 karma
    Rons right
  • guitarnaraguitarnara Alum Member
    365 karma
    Ron that one was real
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    Thanks guys, RC section is confirmed in the thread!
    https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/6923/june-2016-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords

    If you had something in the UNCONFIRMED section and you didn't have experimental for that section, let me know!
  • Sheri123Sheri123 Alum Member
    1196 karma
    Ok, so how did you guys feel about the test, did it just seem like the other 70s PTs you had already taken, easier, harder etc?
  • lastLSATslastLSATs Alum Member
    64 karma
    So the lead actor understudy one is experimental for LG?
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @Skylande said:
    So the lead actor understudy one is experimental for LG?
    Not sure yet, adding to unconfirmed list.
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    Anyone have LR with heme and non-heme food?
  • TH19TH27TH19TH27 Legacy Member
    16 karma
    Yes @Skylande
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @"Dillon A. Wright" said:
    Anyone have LR with heme and non-heme food?
    Looks like this is experimental.
  • Ron SwansonRon Swanson Alum Member Inactive ⭐
    1650 karma
    @"Dillon A. Wright" I didn't have heme vs non-heme I dont think.

    Will an experimental section of a particular type be the same for everyone?
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @"Ron Swanson" said:
    Will an experimental section of a particular type be the same for everyone?
    Not 100% sure, though I've heard of it being different for some on past LSATs.
  • BinghamtonDaveBinghamtonDave Alum Member 🍌🍌
    8673 karma
    Lurking this and a few other forum boards gauging people's reactions to the exam today. Although it might be too early to tell, but from what I have read: LG was "run-of-the-mill" for the LSAT. Is that a fair characterization? Trying to tread lightly, but nothing wild?
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    @doneill3389 said:
    LG was "run-of-the-mill" for the LSAT. Is that a fair characterization? Trying to tread lightly, but nothing wild?
    That's what I've heard too.
  • notwilliamwallacenotwilliamwallace Alum Member
    1049 karma
    @doneill3389 said:
    LG was "run-of-the-mill" for the LSAT
    That's what I am reading too. I am following the TLS thread on this LSAT and people are referring to June's LSAT as a piece of cake. I also read that the LG in Feb LSAT were also nothing out of the ordinary. Could this mean that LSAC will likely tighten the LG and raise the difficulty in the next writing (Sept LSAT)...ahh, that's what I am registered for.
  • runiggyrunruniggyrun Alum Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐
    2481 karma
    Very run of the mill LG. Makes me so pissed I choked and ran out of time.
  • evadywevadyw Member
    edited June 2016 53 karma
    I think it was one of the easiest LG sections I've had in the 70s. RC was brutal.

    My experimental RC was about computer simulation in UK courtrooms, Musical Iconography (?) and Chem vs. Physics. Don't quite remember the third passage which took me 15 minutes...
  • PacificoPacifico Alum Inactive ⭐
    8021 karma
    LG was very straightforward and definitely the easiest of the 70s, although 76 was pretty easy as well. I finished almost 10 minutes early and had time to check almost every single question.

    RC was pretty average difficulty I would say.

    I had three LR, one harder than average and two easier than average. I'm guessing one of the easy ones was the experimental.
  • BinghamtonDaveBinghamtonDave Alum Member 🍌🍌
    8673 karma
    @notwilliamwallace, I am also registered for September, I briefly thought the same thing. My plan is to be ready for anything they throw my way come September!
  • Sheri123Sheri123 Alum Member
    1196 karma
    I didn't think the Feb LG was a piece of cake, I am usually -3 or less on LG & I felt like I had to guess on about 3 or 4 question on one of the games.
  • JustinGrahamJustinGraham Alum Member
    46 karma
    Those with LR,LG,LR,LR,RC format.

    has there ever been a raw total of 102? Because I know I've seen 100/101 as normal totals.

    1st LR was 25,Lg was 23, 2nd and 3rd LR were 26, and RC was 27.

    Assuming that total is not 102. The 2nd or 3rd LR was experimental for me.
  • Ron SwansonRon Swanson Alum Member Inactive ⭐
    1650 karma
    RC was difficult. LG was run of the mill as far as game type but IMO no cake walk.

    I thought the LR was pretty standard assuming my suspected experimental was in fact experimental

    I feel like our good friends at TLS are kind of an unrepresentative sample
  • runiggyrunruniggyrun Alum Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐
    2481 karma
    Were the real LR 25 and 26 Q? I had one 25 and 2 26's. One was a lot harder than the other (imho).
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    Anyone get a LR question involving a Septic Tank?
  • BinghamtonDaveBinghamtonDave Alum Member 🍌🍌
    8673 karma
    @JustinGraham there have been 2 instances of a 102 raw total that I know of: pt 62 and pt 6. Annnnndddd, I just realized I know way too much about this test and have no life. hahahaha
  • PacificoPacifico Alum Inactive ⭐
    8021 karma
    I had 25 LR/23 LG/26 LR/25 LR/27 RC. There has been one 102 that I recall but this was definitely a 101. Your 25 LR was real.
  • runiggyrunruniggyrun Alum Inactive Sage Inactive ⭐
    2481 karma
    No septic tank and I had 3 LR- there must be two experimentals.
  • inactiveinactive Alum Member
    12637 karma
    Some people on reddit had 25/26/25
  • Ron SwansonRon Swanson Alum Member Inactive ⭐
    1650 karma
    @JustinGraham

    Same distribution as you. I think the 3rd LR was the worst of all and hoping that was exp. I though the 25 and 1st 26 were standard LR
  • PacificoPacifico Alum Inactive ⭐
    8021 karma
    Pretty sure they make an entire experimental test so at least 2 fake LRs, 1 fake LG and 1 fake RC.
  • PacificoPacifico Alum Inactive ⭐
    8021 karma
    There is a fake 26 LR and a fake 25 LR.
  • sunofshadowssunofshadows Member
    7 karma
    any idea whether an LG with one about fridges was experimental or not?
  • cmelman95cmelman95 Alum Member
    725 karma
    I FUCKING DID IT AHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.