Hey all, on PT 24, game 4, the rule reads "V cannot be prescribed unless both H and M are prescribed."
J.Y translates this to:
V -> M
V->H.
I am having trouble translating this. I know with these you take an idea, negate it, then apply the translation rule.
I keep coming up with
H & M -> V.
Hope I can get some help!
Comments
It seems like you applied the group 4 rule to the stimulus, as shown by what you came up with. "Unless" falls under group 3 so you are correct that you should negate something, but the other part of the group 3 rule is that the topic you select to negate should also become the sufficient condition. In this instance, you could select the first topic matter to apply this rule to and you would get "V can be prescribed".
Doing so and putting it back into a conditional would allow it to read "If V can be prescribed, then H and M are prescribed", which is equivalent to V -> H&M, also the equivalent of V -> H and V -> M combined. Seems like JY just chose the split up the necessary condition into two conditionals.
~V becomes V, into the Sufficient:
V->
H and M into the Necessary, untouched, so:
V->H and M
Alternately,
H and M becomes ~H or ~M, into the Sufficient:
~H or ~M->
~V into the Necessary, untouched, so:
~H or ~M->~V
V-> H and M = ~H or ~M->~V via contrapositive.