I recently took a 2 day break from LR.
I did 2 LR sections today and had much better results. 23/25 and 22/26. I think maybe I needed to just let information and some of the studying I've been doing, sink in. I definitely feel like some of the answers are just "coming" to me now, rather than having to think hard on them. Especially for the first 10 questions.
It's interesting. The questions I circle for blind review are rarely incorrect and sometimes during review I'll second guess myself and actually put the wrong answer down.
Regardless, I'm still finding time to be an issue. The first section I took was 5 minutes over. The second section was 10.
5 I can deal with...10...not so much.
And I know exactly where I'm slowing down as well. It's the harder questions, anywhere from 15 onward. That's also the area I get most of my wrong answers. The first 10 questions I usually complete in 10ish minutes.
I'm wondering if there are any suggestions or time management strategies, specifically for LR, that any of you would recommend?
Comments
Also, I spoke with someone and they recommended taking the harder LR questions ONLY from a few sections, so around question 15ish until the end (or use 7sage's question bank tool to sort it out), and make an entire LR section of just hard questions. His reasoning was that the harder questions require you to think more in an abstract way and be more alert for very small changes in the argument, as well as very small words you can easily glance at and overlook. These hard LR only sections train you to think a certain way throughout the entire section, therefore allowing you to get into the mindset of attacking each question like a hard question. It should not only improve your accuracy on harder questions, but hopefully your timing as well. This will make the easier questions even more easier he said too, which I believe because he actually happens to be an LSAT tutor.
I found watching the Sage taking PT 37 very liberating. On the first pass, I believe she skips 8 questions, so finishes the section in under 20 min (I believe) She then makes a second pass, and then even a 3rd pass, finally answering all of the questions and finishing in time.
She is able to "bank" those 15 minutes, because she wastes mere seconds on tough questions and skips them.
When I sat the test in June, there were a couple harder questions where I'd seen the blueprint so much before that it was a gimme.
Skipping and the reasons for it, cannot be stressed enough. JY's coconut analogy is on point, if you're trying to collect as many coconuts off a tree, why waste time and energy going for the hard to reach, difficult ones, when you haven't picked all of lower, easier ones off the ground? Skipping hard questions allows you to save mental energy by answering easier ones first and leaving yourself primed for tougher ones!
I think I am wasting my time on only 1 or 2 questions, so the skip strategy makes sense. Didn't think of that before.
1) Creating a skip strategy that works for you.
2) Acclimating yourself to harder questions by taking the harder LR questions ONLY from a few sections, so around question 15-25/26 until the end and make an entire LR section of just hard questions. I started doing this and it's been helpful but also demoralizing LOL.
3) I went through every PT since 39 and "graded" them so I could use 7sage's tool to determine which LR sections are the hardest. My plan is to drill all of those first for accuracy and then timing.
4) Drilling questions that you are spending a little too much time on (like 1.5 minutes instead of a 1 minute or 2 minutes instead of 1.5 minutes) so you fly by those. That way, on the real test, you have more leeway in working on questions that are hard for you.
1st and I think most importantly, I've revamped my blind review system. I downloaded a better PDF tool than Adobe and after each LR section I go through a fresh copy of the test and put detailed notations for each answer choice on a fresh copy of the test; why I think each answer was wrong and why I think the correct answer is correct. I've also been putting notations about my thought process as best I can recall at the time I took the question and comparing with what the correct thought process should be.
I wasn't doing this before. Sure, I was "blind reviewing," but not off a fresh copy of the test. I revamped my blind review after listening to Nicole Hopkins YouTube presentation about it. I also wasn't including detailed explanations for each answer choice. I'm finding that actually writing these explanations out is helping me avoid the tendency to scratch out an answer choice just because it "feels wrong," and forcing me to present logic for each of my decisions. I didn't realize how often I was just picking something because it felt right. If you had asked me, I would have said absolutely not, I never do that. Apparently I did. A lot! As a result, this is making me better at thinking through the problems logically and reducing the number of question I actually have to skip.
2nd, I've been skipping questions I find too difficult. This is currently not a lot! Previously, because I HATE not being able to do something, and have a somewhat stubborn personality, I'd been spending 2-3 minutes possibly, on a couple of the more difficult problems. Of course this isn't acceptable, but my thought process at the time was that I'd eventually get better at them and wouldn't have to take so long ----- but I wasn't doing blind review as efficiently, so I wasn't getting better and just spun my wheels.
I just took a LR section today and finished in 37 minutes and only got 1 wrong. So, I'm definitely improving.
I honestly don't think there's a relationship between the question types I get wrong (although I do absolutely HATE NA Questions), so I'm not going to drill, but I do like the suggestion of taking the harder questions and drilling them, so I'll probably do that!
1) The stimulus just didn't make sense
2) I genuinely have no idea what the answer is, and do not anticipate the ACs helping me much
3) I just don't feel comfortable with that question type and this particular stimulus is confusing
Get to all of the low hanging fruit first (easy questions), then revisit the ones you skipped, with the knowledge that you shouldn't stress out over that particular question because you got to all of the easy ones.
I'm wondering what your thoughts are on my BR process. I'm finding that I'm circling a large number of questions but only changing a few in blind review. For example, I just took a LR section and circled 12 questions. I only changed 3. That number is usually smaller. Sometimes I just change 1.
I'm kind of hoping this number goes down. It's worrying me, because I want to get to the point where I'm circling only 1 or 2 questions per section. Not 12. That's kind of ridiculous. Like, that's half a bloody section. Maybe I just need to have more confidence that I'm picking the right answer? I dunno...
I have never got an answer wrong in BR.
I wouldn't worry too much if you're circling a ton of questions, so long as you are doing so simply because you're only around 80%+ sure that you got the question right, rather than 95%+ sure that you know why the 4 incorrect ACs are incorrect, and why the one correct AC is correct.
Eventually you'll want that number to dwindle down, so that you can focus more of your time on questions that you truly need to devote additional time to.