LR explanation for early PTs

Comments

• tanes256 Alum Member

  September 2016 2573 karma

  @dennisgerrard I don't think the LR explanations go back that far. I think they start around 1PT 5-16 depending on the pkg you bought. Check out the Manhattan LR forums for those. They have just about every question going back to PT 1. I only have explanations starting in the 30s to 50s so I use them quite often.
• 3 Likes

  inactive Alum Member

  September 2016 edited September 2016 12637 karma

  LR starts at PT17. We're still working on LR for PTs 1-16, sorry!
• 2 Likes

  Cant Get Right Yearly + Live Member Sage ⭐ 🍌 7Sage Tutor

  September 2016 edited September 2016 27821 karma

  I actually kinda like that [there!] aren't any explanations for those. It really forces us to work it out for ourselves. We learn way more from that process than JY could ever teach us. Sorry JY!
• 1 Like

  inactive Alum Member

  September 2016 12637 karma

  @"Cant Get Right" said:
  We learn way more from that process than JY could ever teach us. Sorry JY!
  

  J.Y. would be proud.
• Cant Get Right Yearly + Live Member Sage ⭐ 🍌 7Sage Tutor

  September 2016 edited September 2016 27821 karma

  He would NOT be proud of my horrendous misuse of "their"! Omg I'm so embarrassed! What the hell happened!?
• dennisgerrard Member

  September 2016 1644 karma

  haha.you guys r cute
• 1 Like

  DallasOnFire Member

  September 2016 249 karma

  Take it from someone like me (I started my study by looking at PT 1), the LR back then are very weird. Yes the logic is sound, but the question stems and the way they want you to look at the stimulus details differs from what you would see in the modern day. In my opinion it's not critical to look at those. You might even be better off starting at 17.
  
  There are also other resources for explanations available for free on the web, if you think you need it.
• dennisgerrard Member

  September 2016 1644 karma

  thanks @DallasOnFire