Hello All,
I am one those people that when in a group chat, I just let everyone talk and occasionally respond with a "yes" or "no." Similarly, I have been doing that here. I've been keeping up with several discussions and the responses, but never post.
However, I think it's time to ask for help. Let me tell you about my dilemma--- started studying for the September 2016 LSAT back in June using the LSAT Trainer and several PT's. While I was able to jump a couple of points from my original score, I am NOT where I should/can be. My last PT was 148 (9/5), and that's when I decided to postpone my exam until December. Since 9/5, I have been drilling LR and most recently on LGs. I purchased the Powerscore LG bible and that's where I saw my LG score increase. It didn't increase tremendously, but something is something. Just got the Powerscore LR bible and will start on that once I feel comfortable with LGs.
I mentioned that I used the LSAT trainer at first, and I will have to say that it did not work for me.
I work a full time job (9-6) Mon-Fri, so I study everyday during the week ~3hours. On the weekends, I spend 4-5 hours studying--drilling LR and LG. Something did not go well the first time around in my studying routine so, I need to make a change and do it FAST. I would greatly appreciate it if someone shed some light on my situation that help me increase my score.
Thank you so much in advance!!
Comments
I don't know if I'll be much help here because I loved the LSAT trainer and it really helped me. But to be fair, I do think it would not have been the case had I not started with the Powerscore books. They are very good help when you first start. I do think the strategy's are sound in both books.
I think it would help to have more information. Are you able to implement the strategies that the books recommend?
Have you done the LG Bundle and foolproof all the games from PT 1-35? It is possible to achieve -0 on LG. I started with -16 on LG and ended up -2 to -0 on my most recent PTs.
My suggestion: after fool proofing LG Bundle, take LG sections of PT 1-35 under time and watch J.Y explanation after completing each section but this time when you watching focus mostly on how he teaches to perceive the right answer choice (instead of brute force) and try to implement his suggestions on the next section.
Do not get bog down on one question (take a hint if possible) but if you find one super difficult and you are confident about your master game board, skip the question answer others in that particular game then come back to it use your other set ups you drew; if nothing works finish the section and if you have extra time come back to it. The ultimate goal is to be able to systematically answer any questions so when under exam pressure you just follow your system. You need to develop a system that works best for you. The system I am trying to follow is like
1- read the question set up the sketch try make obvious inferences
2- check answer choices
3- If still confused take count of the items write them near questions and go through the rules one by one make inferences
4- check answer choices
5- If still stuck, SKIP the question
6- After I have done all other questions I will take another try at it by only checking the question against all of my sketches (I do not try to make inferences again unless I already finished the section)
Pacifico Logic Games Attack Strategy
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy
J.Y fool-proof guide
https://7sage.com/lesson/fool-proof-guide-to-perfection-on-logic-games/
I hope this helps you
I was spending hour and hours everyday trying to boost my logical reasoning score, but it can only get you so far if you aren't tackling the fundamental problems. On top of that JY teaches you strategies that are fundamental to studying that no other book tells you. Such as Blind Review and Grammar lessons. In addition, he clearly explains how you get from point A to B in the logic diagrams.
I also just recently bought the trainer. After I finish the CC for 7sage, I'll definitely move on to the trainer and from there just do practice tests and redo the CC for 7sage again after a couple practice tests.
I recommend starting 7sage for sure and try not to waste too many PT's before you feel like you got the core concepts down.
What's my point? Try to develop a stronger 'LSAT Foundation.' How do I think you can do this? Re-read chapters, re-watch videos, BR LR/RC, 'fool proof' LG, and use Mike Kim's approach to RC. Hope this helps!
@lawgikal makes a great point. You want a program that teaches the underlying foundation of the LSAT. Both the LSAT Trainer and 7Sage offer this. PowerScore is more about individual techniques. Because the LSAT Trainer did not work for you, you should consider 7Sage.
The Bibles tend to work well for those who are going to do well anyways. I have yet to hear someone who started with a 140s diagnostic use the Bibles to get past the 150s or 160s. The teach you the basics and some gimmicky ways to do things. I think the LR Bible is actually great, but for LG they just don't have an intuitive approach. The double not rules and all of their grouping diagramming really left me lost.
As other have said above me, go with 7Sage. I can't recommend it highly enough. If you want a change start there. The 7Sage course and philosophy is objectively better than anything else out there. My reasoning behind this statement is that the techniques make sense! The approach the LG is clean, simple, and works! The LR lessons are all based on the idea that LR questions are all related to each other in some way and once you begin to recognize the similarities and patterns, you can get really GOOD and consistent at LR.
In June my diagnostic was a 151 and after 3 months of 7Sage I am well into the 160s range. You have to put the work in, but the course gives you all you need!
If you've already tried The LSAT Trainer, there really isn't much else I would recommend. I am a big fan of Manhattan LSAT Prep books, but they were co-authored by Mike Kim of The LSAT Trainer so I am going to assume those books won't help much either.
If you are still scoring in the 140s a couple of things to do:
Stop doing PTs - at this point you are wasting them. You aren't going to learn much from just doing PTs without the skills needed.
I suggest starting from the beginning again. You are clearly missing some big fundamental ideas... Do you understand things like argument structure? How to properly find the conclusion/main point, strengthen and weaken and argument? Conditional logic?
These are core principles that are absolutely necessary conditions to doing well on this test.
For about a month I tried to ignore really understand conditional logic and sufficient and necessary assumption indicators. After I went back and revised JY's lessons on these things my LR score went from missing 6-7 to about 3 per section now. That alone probably increased my score 5 points..
Thank you once again to all and good luck studying!!