Hello all,
I am sure you have seen this question pop up hundreds or thousands of times, but I like to get as diverse an opinion as possible.
situation:
I currently reside in San Antonio, Texas and will be applying for the following term. I have contacted St. Mary's law school, which is the only law school in San Antonio, and I am essentially a guarantee given my GPA and LSAT score from three years ago.
Plan for the future: My wife and I plan on staying in San Antonio completely. She has her own primary care clinic that she will run once she is out of residency so our chances of movement are minimal. There are plenty of law opportunities here, and even a few big law.
I understand that it is basically impossible to get into big law from a school like St. Mary's unless you are the top 2 or 3 percent of your class, but I am not sold on big law anyway. For me, I could be looking at a life of civil rights/ immigration law once I am done.
Given all of this, is a school that is in the fourth tier something I should be weary about?
I am going to spend all of my couple of years out of law school paying back debt, and will be fortunate enough to have some back up with my wife for any other expenses so the salary doesn't have to be hundreds of thousands of dollars out of law school.
What I do want is an automatic opportunity to work and build up my work flow.
I have done research about some of the firms in the area and St. Mary's seems to have a pretty good stranglehold on the region.
Have you guys seen something similar? Fourth tiers often holding par in the region they are in but falling flat the moment you get out of the region unless you are top of the class?
Thank you for any of your input. I am currently sending out applications, and any input is great input.
Comments
The idea would be to reduce or eliminate any debt resulting from law school so that the reduced income of legal jobs in the region (as compared to BigLaw) would not be a serious problem.
Basic point is that little to no debt upon graduation should theoretically give you more freedom of choice in your career, assuming good academic performance, recommendations, etc.
I have a couple of friends who graduated from T3 and T4 school's. They got more scholly money at those school's (compared to the higher ranked schools they applied to) and did really well and got the job's they wanted. I do want to add that neither of them was interested in Big Law, and they focused on the clinics of the school's they applied to and made sure that they are regionally well known schools that would allow them to network a great deal.
For instance, if your family owned a local law firm and you just need a JD to work there. Then a T3/T4 law school might be something to consider.
There are also varying degrees of T3/T4 schools and some are unquestionably better than others. Rankings seem to matter a whole lot less and location a whole lot more. For example, attending CUNY or NYLS in NYC is objectively a bad idea. There are many law schools in NY, and NYC is the legal capital of the world and attracts lawyers from all over the globe.
Then there are podunk law schools in Oregon that feed grads into the local legal market where they probably care more about ties to the area, resume, and things besides your school's rank.
However, after reading what you wrote under no circumstances should you attend St. Mary's Law School if you want to be an attorney.
https://www.lstreports.com/schools/stmarys/
47% of grads in 2015 found legal employment. You'd literally have less than a coin flip's chance of becoming an attorney from this school. So although there might be legal jobs, apparently most grads of this school are not finding them. 1.9% found big law jobs.
It is $200,000 tuition (36% pay full price) for a next to nothing chance at even becoming an attorney. Schools like these are part of what's been deemed "the law school scam."
It seems like you're a prudent fellow and place high value on making sure you can readily find employment after you graduate. So to answer your question, yes, you should be extremely weary about this school and all T3/T4s across the board. Law school has changed so much over the past 30 years and now there's a pretty good argument to make that the wholesale rejection of T3/T4 schools is the default move. You say you plan to pay back the debt within your first few years out, but it looks like the average salary of the 47% who find jobs is under $40k.
Here's the ranking by employment/bar passage of all the law schools in Texas
http://law-schools.startclass.com/d/d/Texas
I'm actually unfamiliar with where San Antonio is in relation to all the law schools listed in the link above, but maybe commuting would be an option?
In any case, make getting a high LSAT score your top priority so no matter what path you choose, you can mitigate debt.
Good luck!
@"Alex Divine" nailed it on the head.
I am definitely iffy on this situation myself.
What Alex said has definitely been on my mind, and the added info about employment rate is really shocking but gives me clarity.
From what I understand, these schools are only worth it if you get a free ride or place as high as you possibly can in your class (top 5 percent). I assume that's where the 47 percent employment rate comes from. Either already established legal jobs through inheritance or top of class.
I know of one student who had issues finding employment, but she was Middle of the class there. She has found employment in a field she didn't want to be in, but she is a lawyer so that's something.
This will be a tough process. Without a doubt.
Again, I really appreciate your input.
Yes. It is my dream school in Texas. I will be applying there, but need to hit a 168 on the LSAT to be competitive. I am still a little bit away from that and am getting a bit concerned that I may not hit.
At the moment, I am applying everywhere except Texas Southern.
Most likely, though, I will say in the San Antonio, Waco, or Austin region.
I really want to stay in San Antonio since my wife is almost assured a residency spot here next year, and we have been long distance for a while. We would like to settle down finally.
So, yes, Austin is definitely my hopeful wish. The only negative is the hour to hour and 15 minute drive I would be doing daily if I got in. That's a huge drag, but the education and placement in Texas is unparalleled. I hope you get in if you guys end up here. Austin is an incredible place. Also, it feels completely out of place in the Texas environment. At times, I feel like I am in Seattle.
My greatest battle right now is whether I will get close to or an entire full ride to St.Mary's or whether I could get away with being top of the class. I don't exactly have top of the class history, and going to St. Mary's would basically necessitate a top of the class finish if I wanted a job out of law school (when I say top I mean top 5% and that's not easy).
Anyway, best of luck to you and yours. If you end up going to UT, message me on here. It would be nice to hear.
For instance, their summer and spring median for LSAT was 154/155 and GPA was 3.4/5. That's insanely low for a top 60 program.
That also means that a person with a 3.2/ 155 split has a chance to get in if they are willing to start in Spring or Summer.
If I get into St. Mary's but not into Austin, I may look into Baylor law for the following spring and apply after the June LSAT.
The other thing I would say is be cautious on the scholarships with St. Mary's - I hear that some of them are contingent upon achieving certain GPAs in 1L and 2L. There's a site where you can look into that stuff, just need to find it again...
You're spot on the St. Mary's scholarships by the way. I have read through some of theirs online and most of them are completely reliant on your GPA through law school. This is not as big a throw off for me, since I will be working my butt off if I go there to ensure I have a job going out of law school.
Right now, if things don't work out with UT or Baylor, I am basically either going to go to St. Mary's with a scholarship/ fight for my life to be as high in the class as possible so I could get work, or apply for a better position and get ready for the 2018 cycle.
I am not sure. Either way, I am taking the February LSAT so I will know whether I have a shot fairly quick.
Another thing I have been told is that if you have trouble getting a high LSAT score you should be weary of the hubris needed to think you'll just work hard and be in the top X% of your class. Every student thinks they'll be in the top 10% and clearly that's mathematically impossible.
All this to say: Prep hard and take as long as you need with the LSAT. It literally pays dividends!
This this this.
It is something I tell myself daily when looking at the downsides of going to St. Mary's.
Also, just this summer, a senior partner at Haynes & Boone (a close friend) told me that they will hire someone from St. Mary's, because they understand the reasons for attending that school (other jobs, spousal commitments, etc.), but only the top 1 or 2 people in the class are made an offer. And those have stellar credentials on top of their grades.
Good luck!
I am definitely on the fence. I will apply and if I don't get into UT, I may have some serious soul searching to do.
http://www.haynesboone.com/people?offices=San-Antonio
Half of the associates there are from St. Mary's. And one partner.
Good stuff! Sounds like a pragmatic plan.
Good luck, LoftGuy!
Unfortunately for me, but fortunately for my wife, she is basically assured a spot in San Antonio (her hometown and where we plan on living). We are really averse to long distance since we spent so much time being long distance in the beginning of our relationship. Plus, we have puppies and hope to have kids in a couple of years. Long distance would obviously place a strain on things.
So, I am kind of stuck. I am still applying all over Texas, but I am stuck on St. Mary's and UT at the moment. It's tough. I would gladly go to an SMU, Baylor, or U of H with an easier route in order to increase my job prospects, but at the cost of unnecessary familial hardships I am not so sure.
Baylor seems like my best option for long distance. It is a two hour and fifteen minute drive and that's not a bad drive to make on the weekends. Plus, if I don't make the fall session, their standards for spring and summer acceptance are ridiculously low (154/ 3.4 are the medians).
NYLS and CUNY law school are just bad in every metric that is important.
NYLS is one of the most expensive law schools in the United States and has some of the lowest employment stats, bar passage rates, and under-employment scores. They report that around 48% of grads find employment 9 months out, but have been embroiled in numerous law suits for misrepresenting those stats. In court proceedings, they basically admitted that although they fudged the employment numbers, prospective students were actually at fault because any reasonable person should have known they couldn't be true. Something to that effect.
Lastly, NYLS is in NYC which is the legal capital of the world. Law grads from all over the country and world all compete for jobs in NY, both in the public and private sector.
CUNY is actually not as bad in theory, but in practice it tends to suffer from most of the same problems at NYLS. the good thing about CUNY is that if you’re a NY resident, tuition is fairly low. Housing on the other hand is not… But it too suffers from low employment, low bar passage, and more importantly the stigma. One of my managers at work is an ex-lawyer and he basically said that law firms in NYC don’t harbor very positive feelings about CUNY/NYLS grads because they graduate woefully unprepared to practice. And although CUNY markets itself as a public interest law school, PI positions are actually very competitive. And you’ll be competing not only with HYS, but also NYU, Columbia, Cornell, Fordham and the other 5-6 NYC based law schools. All of which basically rank higher.
Just google what some grads have to say about these schools. Most will warn you to stay away.
I think a problem with lower tiered schools is that negative stigma. It’s widely known that because they accept students with such low GPAs/LSAT scores that they essentially have to spend 3 years prepping them to pass the bar exam, lest the lose their ABA accreditation. Taking a glorified 3-year bar course causes grads to enter the legal work force unprepared.
Of course, there’s always exceptions! So don’t take what I say as gospel and do some research.
https://www.lstreports.com/schools/newyork/
https://www.lstreports.com/schools/cuny-queens/
@Alex damn, i almost decided to go to CUNY, eye opener