It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
The answer for this question is E. I don't think any of the answers really have a logic structure that parallels to that of the stimulus. For the stimulus I got:
CA--> P
CA some MR
therefore, P some MR
For E I got:
SP some TP
SO some TP
therefore SO --> SP
I won't exactly say they are parallel, though E is the closest answer I guess.
Any thoughts on this?
Comments
"since" reveals the conclusion to be
SP some P
the remaining are all premises:
SO some P
and
SO ----> SP
Organized in this manner allows it to match the stim perfectly
As @Freddy_D says, "since" introduces the premise. So (E) can be diagrammed like this
(E)
SO —> SP
SO <-s->TP
——
SP <-s-> TP
Stimulus says:
CA —> P
CA <-s-> MR
——
P <-s-> MR
It matches (E) perfectly.