Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

4 Possible Explanations for Causation

greybrownbluegreybrownblue Member
edited November 2017 in Logical Reasoning 87 karma

Hi everyone,

I am stumbling upon this concept on this lesson https://7sage.com/lesson/4-possible-explanations/

Correlation implies causation but, according to logic and lawgic, causation DOES NOT imply correlation. To my understanding, this lesson is telling me a completely different story and I cannot see the nuance. How is it possible that if A causes B, B can cause A???

Thanks very much!

Show Related Discussions

Comments

  • BinghamtonDaveBinghamtonDave Alum Member ⭐ 🍌🍌
    8711 karma

    Knowing causation implies implicitly that there is correlation. Knowing for instance that dust from an attic caused me to sneeze implies that the dust from the attic and the sneeze are correlated.

    Now, simply knowing correlation does not imply causation. Because, in the lesson you point out, knowing two things are correlated gives rise to several possibilities that explain that correlation. Me sneezing might also be correlated with various small earthquakes throughout the world. That does not mean that the earthquakes have caused me to sneeze. Many things in our world are spuriously correlated, meaning they occur together but have zero causal relationship.

    I hope this helps
    David

  • greybrownbluegreybrownblue Member
    87 karma

    It does. Thank you Dave!

Sign In or Register to comment.