Help! No obvious weakness...

Comments

• 1 Like

  10000019 Alum Member

  December 2017 3279 karma

  @JesseBear said:
  Hey all,

  I am consistently missing 2-3 on each section. So no obvious weaknesses are popping out to me. Still, I need to make the jump from the high160s to mid-170's consistently. Who has done this? How does one do this? Lol any help appreciated.

  Thanks 7sage

  Are you missing a particular type of question more frequently?
  Are you missing questions in a certain part of the test more frequently?
  Have you looked at the analytics?
• 4 Likes

  FerdaFresh Alum Member

  December 2017 561 karma

  Your "obvious weakness" is LG.

  -2 or -3 on RC is amazing. -2 on LR is really good; odds are you're usually just missing curve breakers. Get that LG score perfect like it should be. It'd be a shame for someone scoring as high as you to not have a perfect logic games score.
• JesseBear Alum Member

  December 2017 40 karma

  @FerdaFresh

  Thanks everyone. Is it true that top scorers usually get -0 on Games?
• 1 Like

  LSATcantwin Alum Member Sage ⭐

  December 2017 13286 karma

  @JesseBear said:
  @FerdaFresh

  Thanks everyone. Is it true that top scorers usually get -0 on Games?
  

  Some top scorers get -0/-1 on games, yes. It is widely held that this is the "easiest section to improve" so people drill them obsessively because it's the easiest section to see your score move in.

  However like @FerdaFresh mentioned a -2/-3 in RC is less common, so that is definitely a strength of yours.

  Consider this though, -3 on each real section is -12. On a hard to average test you are hitting 170. On an easy test you'd drop to maybe a 168. So YOU are a high scorer!