Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
jessica8871
About
- Username
- jessica8871
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,983
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
the argument is like this: home and /house house and /home not (house ---> home) so the conclusion that being at home is not necessary for being in one's own house is supported by the premise that we can be in our house without being at ho…
-
basically it's saying there is a difference between manners and morals. the difference is that manners ---> social whereas morals doesn't have to be social. An example of this would be you kicked a rock. That's an immoral action but that's not ne…
-
Did you link your account to LawHub ?
-
E is the correct AC, not C.
-
so the way you would diagram this is LP PS LP SO. LP --> Influence So the inferences we can draw are SO Influence and PS Influence. AC A gives us SO Influence.
-
Think of this as an example. If it's an apple then it's a fruit. We can have 4 situations. 1) when the sufficient condition is triggered (i.e. you have an apple), what else do you know? You know you also have a fruit. This must be true because the …
-
because the canceled effect doesn't apply to these residents. These residents have normal blood sugar, not very low blood sugar levels. D is correct because we are told that these residents have this blood protein that prevents vascular blockage, an…
-
Basically the stimulus points out all the advantages / benefits of picking Mount Shalko as the site for the proposed observatory. One of the premises used to support the astronomer's argument is that the observatory would not be a threat to endemic …
-
so the two ideas here are (1) no dog can go and (2) owners leave. The symbols are "/DG" and "OL". Following group 3 translation, we identify the indicator as "until" which is negate sufficient. So this translates to "DG ---> OL". Note that the DG…
-
I always see @"Matt Sorr"'s helpful comments on the forum. Well deserved and congrats to all the winners!
-
I am so happy for you!!! I am currently at the point where I am doubting myself if I can really do it. Your words are encouraging and I wish you the best with your law school journey!
-
there's no explanation videos for PT A, B, C, and PTF 97. But there are explanation videos for all the other RC sections, so if you mind that just don't do those old PTs.
-
I would recommend early on so you can work on the areas you struggle with. It takes time to get better, especially on RC.
-
Congrats on your score !! Very happy for you !
-
Chris, I think you meant "May" and not April.
-
including "both" in the rule just means the "or" is an inclusive "or", which means it is ok to have both P and L in. How JY diagramed it captures that idea. If we don't see P then we must see L. What if we see P? Then the rule goes away and L become…
-
I am just curious, but is it possible for the LSAC to make a mistake ? A 135 seems way out of your range. That's at least a 20 point difference which I think is too much because it seems like you definitely have the fundamentals.
-
I am really sorry to hear what you are going through right now, it must be a very difficult time for you and your family. If you know you are not ready for the Jan LSAT, I would recommend that you delay it until you are ready for the test. I had to …
-
Congratulations ! Thank you for sharing !
-
ok but what does D actually say? D says "If conservationists intervene to help squirrel monkeys survive, then the squirrel monkeys will not become extinct", which translates to "Intervene --> /Extinct". Is that the same as what you wrote ? You w…
-
I feel you. I was really burnt out last year after studying for 4 months and saw no improvement in my score. I felt like I was making progress and learning more, but my score wasn't reflecting that. What I did to overcome this burn out was just taki…
-
@ellemkay said: @melsathope said: I will answer your questions but please also go to the link above. What am I allowed to bring with me? Ive been doing all my PTs with a blank piece of paper to write notes or dra…
-
You are right, you cannot just negate the sufficient. But JY did that to show us what the rule means. The rule says "if 2C and at least 1 L voted the same way then both M's voted that way as well". This rule is a little different than how you would …
-
Hi! I PM you
-
This is a classic "some people say X, but they are wrong". Basically we are told that some residents of M think M is more expensive to live in than other towns, but our author says these residents are mistaken. This is the conclusion because the res…
-
Thank you so much @LSAT Lizard! It makes so much sense now
-
you can google the question. Powerscore and MahattanPrep usually have explanations for them.
-
"I took the Nov 2021 LSAT and then the Jan 2022 LSAT as a last hail Mary. She did not answer my prayers, which makes sense because I never go to church" hahaha you are so funny!!!! Huge congratulations on your score!! Hopefully I can reach my dream …
-
Why can't we keep them as is now ? I like the problem sets in addition to the drills
-
having a lamp is fine just make sure there's no sticky notes or anything!