@TheDesertGrandfather: The soviets have been crushed! They're in some swapped building or other heh
@MrSamlam: Cheers brother. I'd never considered law school / the LSAT how you just described, but you're right... today's administration was my enga…
"Great moments are born out of great opportunity. That's what you have here tonight boys. That's what you've earned here tonight."
"If we played them ten times they might win nine. But not this (logic) game. Not tonight.
Tonight we diagram with …
Wow guys and gals, thank you so much for all of this. I can't respond to it all as in-depth as I would like, given the fact that it's 12:48 AM here on the east coast, but thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
All of your words have come to me at a time…
Friend A
Friend B - stayed for a week, Gender: Male
This is a simple In Out Grouping Game.
In Group: Two slots
Out group: undefined slots
Rule: If you're (1) an uninvited guest or (2) a male, you're out
The In Group has been filled already by p…
I'll hop on the Suits train here, but I've also found The Good Wife to be absolutely amazing. I've been binge watching it - sort of - in between studying these last few weeks
"Pour up, drank, head shot, drank
Sit down, drank, stand up, drank
Pass out, drank, wake up, drank
Faded, drank, faded, drank"
In actuality, six logic games sections from PTs 70-74, two logic reasoning sections, watching The Good Wife, and chilling
@"Stevie C"
Understood. My problem was that "evaluating legislation" *is* descriptively accurate for what we're doing in the stimulus. In the stimulus, we certainly do consider the consequence of passing (the harm done to free speech when we censo…
@Mr.lopez :
Method 1
CM = Cold Medicine
NW = Nip Whiskey
SC = Stop Crying
We have: SC --> (( CM v NW ) & ~ (CM & NW) )
Negating it we do
~ (CM v NW) v (CM & NW)
Which turns into:
(~CM & ~NW) v (CM & NW) --> ~SC
…
@Sami
Thank you very much! That helped a great deal. I didn't realize that this was a PSA question. Thanks for clearing it up
For others who are having the same problem as me:
We have the premise that:
(P1) The damage done by violent progra…
Yes, exactly. It's worth mentioning that lemurs aren't birds, also.
What I'm saying is this. The answer choice (D) says:
(1) There are 2x rainforest lemurs than deciduous lemurs
We're asked to solve why
(2) We see more deciduous lemurs at nig…
Oh! Lol. No, J.Y. just transcribes those out because he doesn't want to rewrite the entire question. They're meant to substitute for the actual question so as to not take up space on the video.
You're not meant to transcribe the questions as he doe…
Okay. So in order to figure out why (D) is wrong, let's figure out why (B) is correct. This is a classic Resolve, Reconcile, Explain question type.
We've got two populations of lemurs. One lives in the deciduous forest, where canopy disappears dur…
@"steve-10"
Also, when doing LG games sometimes you have to cross off certain game pieces. Let's say you have a game with pieces A,B,C,D,E,F. And on a particular question, you know that F & E are grouped together, B and one other are grouped, …
@CrushLSAT
No problem! Yes. If you (1) don't criticize your own behavior or (2) vow to stop it or (3) both then you should not criticize other's behavior. Because if you're doing (3) both, you're simply stating that in this world, you simultaneous…
@"Creasey LSAT" said:
I would think it's exclusive because "vows to stop" implies that one has already self-criticized that behavior.
I don't think you can make this assumption. Let's say that my friend tells me to stop borrowing his car. Now, I m…
Your translation is incorrect. The negation does not carry over to vow, as ~vow to stop it would mean that you're NOT vowing to stop it.
I believe that this is an inclusive or. Here's why:
(1) If one does not criticize a form of behavior in ones…
@"Stevie C" said:
I hear JY's voice saying "What?! Why do we care?! Oldest trick in the book!"
Oh god I love this. Or when you see a right answer and go there ya go C is the correct choice xD
Hilarious. JY is a god
JY writes out translations for LR sections (Government Economics as GE) merely to translate to logic (or lawgic for us 7sagers) to show you the type of thinking you need to be doing to solve questions. Once you become adept at this, you don't need t…
This is how I see it. The mistake here is that we're assuming that just because we can interpret the world/certain concepts in a particular way, that the world actually DOES operate under those concepts.
For example, I can understand the world by …
Yes.
/JL breaks down into two conditionals:
(1) /J --> L
(2) L --> /J
Let's take the contrapositives of each.
(1b) /L --> J
(2b) J --> /L
We can combine (1b) and (2b) to form the following biconditional:
(2) /L J , or as y…
So I'm currently enrolled in Blueprint and 7sage, but I primarily use 7sage. Here are the biggest differences in my opinion.
Teaching Quality
I'm a self--learner. I move quickly and digest information at a rapid pace. I wanted an online course th…
I think that it honestly depends person to person. You should proceed at the pace that allows you to move quickest while simultaneously comprehending information. Moving quickly with zero comprehension is WAY worse in my opinion than moving slower w…