Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Constantine
About
- Username
- Constantine
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,010
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
"Ideally … should be," which is the same as "preferred."
-
Unless your PTs are in your target score, it would be best if you do not take the LSAT yet. If you are averaging at your target, drilling LR and RC weaknesses would be the best bet. If you feel like you are a quick and robust learner, I can stabil…
-
This is not the case (that "impossible to improve on RC"). It would help if you changed your perception of RC. People have a significant improvement on RC with the right mindset; for example, see the success story here (see the last two comments): h…
-
-
@"giulia.pines" said: Do you mean which types of questions I'm getting right/wrong on the section? They were trending towards SA/PSA and Weaken questions earlier, but now it's honestly mostly dumb mistakes I don't catch! Thanks SA and …
-
Diana, congratulations!! I'm so glad that you made it!
-
You should not cancel a 160+. First of all, schools could assume that you did cancel something at least a few points lower. Second of all, yes, a 160+ is a good score. Finally, this is still a tiny chance that you'll get a worse score on the second …
-
When you read an argument, you should pay attention to the method of reasoning. This argument concludes that it "should have been left there" is general, and the author provides only archeological considerations. So the author's method of reasoning …
-
What implications (consequences) that "The Earth's geologically stable regions have been studied more intensively by geologists than have its less stable regions." for the argument? We don't know. So the answer choice E must be eliminated because it…
-
PT1.S3.Q10 To follow directions from the argument ("restrict the dissemination of advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value", "selectively prohibit dissemination to certain countries, those that are or will …
-
https://abovethelaw.com/uploads/2021/08/Class-of-2024-YOY-stat-changes-620x264.png
-
@HopefullyHLS said: Anyways (in case you are not trolling): whatever your LSAT score is, I would strongly advise you not to say anything close to what you're posting here during the interviews. Interviews are there for a reason, which is filte…
-
I see your point. The advice is for a 165+ score. Most people never get it anyway. But yes, if you want to get 165+, explanations should be the last resort, especially "content-based explanations" (as opposed to logic-based).
-
There is a spell checker incorporated into the system! I'm sure you can't use outside software like Grammarly (my opinion).
-
You can use highlights as a learning tool at the moment, untimed. Timed: if you -3 or better, you can highlight. But if you worst then that highlighting is an additional obstacle.
-
PT41G4
-
That is the commitment! Thanks for the motivation and, yes, good luck!
-
PrepTest 90, June 2020 LSAT – August 11, 2021 (amazon), but it's not clear when it ends up in the LawHub
-
An excellent way to go!
-
Congratulations!
-
@yang9999 said: also, group size matters -- if you start to get too big (past about 3-4 people), it will become almost impossible to sustain focused study for long term periods. I'm talking about one on one sessions.
-
@"Jonathan Wang" said: Yeah, don't take it personally. People do this to paid tutors, too. It's why every experienced tutor has a no-show policy and at least one absurd story to tell.
-
@hopefulling said: I always thought it was an age-thing and a lack of maturity sticking to commitments or with interactions with others. I was always surprised by the 'crickets' in Discord groups up until the last few weeks before the test. I …
-
Starting on May 5 there are going to be no more than five people in each session.
-
As of now, we have three members of the group who scored 170+ in the April test: 171,171,173! Congratulations to you guys!
-
You should not cancel a166! First of all, schools would assume that you did cancel something at least 10 points lower. Second of all, a 166 is a great score.
-
Hi, guys. I added PT 8 on Wednesday, April 28, from 5-8 pm Est time as an experiment to see if additional PT per week would help keep us at 170+. Let me know your thoughts on it and if you're joining.
-
@"BobtheBuilder-1" said: Bro you might want to reevaluate doing 8 hours a day. Studying for that long might just give you diminishing returns. For sure.
-
@Samer203 said: Hello all. It was a great opportunity to join you all last session. Thanks again @Constantine! Has it been decided what PT are we doing for 4/24? Thanks, Samer, for joying our group. For 4/24, it's PT 53: 2nd section of LR, L…
-
@sarahc14 said: Hi! I would love to join in future sessions, how do I become a part of this?? Great! To join the group, please pm me