"Your latter interpretation designates obligation as a sufficient condition and best interests as a necessary condition. But the second sentence assigns best interests to the sufficient side, while the conclusion places obligation on the necessary s…
I'm so glad you're here too @Alohalena ! While I am nowhere near the end of my LSAT journey I have fought off thoughts of giving up on this test by reminding myself giving up only means letting the LSAT win. We'll get there!
Exactly what I was thinking too about athletes! Especially those whose end product looks more like art i.e. figure skating, ballet. Hmmm I wonder if high 170 scorers are able to correctly anticipate the correct answer most of the time.