Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
btate87
About
- Username
- btate87
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,231
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
That's awesome! Congrats!
-
Completely agree. I spent enough time with it the day I can definitely see what the writers intended. Trying to highlight where the confusion happened on my part (which seems to be fairly widespread) rests on a train of thought that could be sparke…
-
I can't see his explanation either, but the shift from "the" to "this" seems to weaken the sense of bi-conditionality. By not sticking with "the" it reads to me as though it is opening up the application of laws from outside Weston. It's been a few …
-
Hi there! As for PT's, I would say two at the absolute max. I did one full PT on weekends and one much earlier PT (from the 50ish range) as a one section/day PT. So two per week, but not both in one setting. I think the biggest benefit to that stra…
-
You'll find sections like that that just wreck you. Remember the difficulty is entirely subjective. Even if something's a "2 star" doesn't mean it isn't a 16 star for you. Treat it like a learning opportunity. Were your misses concentrated on a spec…
-
I did a sort of staggered sequence of later PT's. I started at 65 to make sure I had PT's saved for future dates, then did 65, 75, 66, 76, 67, 77 etc. Then I jumped to 83 this week before the June date.
-
@AshleighK Yes and no. I never really stopped the fool proofing train, but I did focus on troublesome games. I did every game at least twice on each pass (so 4 total). Games that I had any ounce of hesitation on I kept in the rotation. I constantly …
-
I did both. I went 1-35 in order. Then I divided them all by type and did them again.
-
At least 1-35. Doing 1/day is the fastest you should aim for. 40-50 days is pretty realistic.
-
If you're doing that well on BR and are skipping questions at the END, then I would look into skipping strategies. There are posts in the forum as well as discussions in webinars. I aim for two benchmarks to keep me on track. 1) 15 questions in 15 …
-
If there's a game that really tripped you up, try 1) finishing it by solving for all worlds 2) finishing without solving all worlds - try to mine inferences step 1 uncovered 3) if possible solve it with another board (grouping, double-layer sequenci…
-
I was planning to start when I was 30 before realizing 3 months definitely wasn't enough study time. Luckily it turns out (for me anyway) once you get past 30, the time crunch seems less intense haha.
-
That is frustrating, but don't lose hope. If you're BR score is that high you can push through it. Here are some things that might help Endurance: As mentioned above - do longer tests. Work up to 6 sections if you need to. Or maybe do two tests yo…
-
That all looks promising to me! We all have a range of scores we are likely to hit. It seems to often be +/- 3-5 points. Test 2 might have played to your strengths and been a little inflated, test 3 may have played to weaknesses, or there is just so…
-
I can't speak to what employment opportunities may be available for you as well as some other people on the forum surely can. However, if you're in a place where you don't need the income, and it's something you really want to do then why not? Just …
-
Have you done or read any of the LG fool proof methods? (Master all games in PTs 1-35)
-
The only one I can think of that isn't in 7sage videos is I never write numbers for sequencing games. I draw vertical lines so I can tell which space is which. For 5 spaces between 2|3 For 6 spaces between 3|4 For 7 spaces between 3|4 For 8 spac…
-
@anonclsstudent I totally get that impulse, it just never struck me as important. During the bulk of my post-CC prep I tracked my progress based on how many points I missed per section, but I intentionally did sections in an order that kept me from …
-
I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I don't see the point. I worked through tests with a soft timer and got an idea of what the test was, then started prepping. I had no desire for the voice in the back of my mind to be telling me that most people onl…
-
160 is definitely doable! How quickly depends a lot on your personal strengths/weaknesses and how efficient your study is. From what you described, I would recommend putting a timer on much more regularly (if not all the time). It doesn't mean you h…
-
Congrats!!
-
I just returned to the Hannah LG for the first time in probably 9-10 months. I was completely dumbfounded by it back then. It made perfect sense right away yesterday.
-
Remember to treat it similarly to LR and LG: return to passages you've already done a lot. It seems simple, but it took me way too long to realize. You can't get everything out of a LG after doing it two or three times over two or three days. Go ove…
-
Yes. Get through the CC and fool proof LG. I don't think you'll find a quality breakdown of fundamentals like 7sage CC anywhere else for such a low price.
-
Everything has pretty well been covered above, but I only have the starter pack and can tell you it was enough for me. I never did a legit diagnostic, but it likely would have been in the low 150's. I did all three Bibles cover to cover, after two L…
-
Thanks so much! I made it all the way until the last 3 weeks before only having the starter pack kicked me in the butt! As always, it's good to know JY has echoed frustration with a question haha
-
A few thoughts that might help you study the difference between the two Ask yourself... SA: If this answer is true, is the conclusion definitely true? (Can this argument lose with this?) NA: If this answer is not true, does it undermine the argum…