As JY says: (E) explains the logical error committed as a lack of consideration for all the other ways children may experience breathing problems during sleep. Even if removing tonsils is a good way to aid against such problems you still have other …
@az.avdagic said:
I'm not sure if this is a "it takes more time" kind of thing or a "you're just not meant for law school" kind of thing,
It's the former. With commitment and desire anything is possible. Just practice and the seemingly impossible …
“1. From the total pool of students who took the SP101 class MOST attended every class. 2. If you were a student who received a C+ or lower then you were a student who did not attend every class.” This is all the info we have to go off. If you contr…
ac-A says "The subspecies of zebras with the best-defined stripes is also characterized by exceptional size and vigor." To me. this does not strengthen the conclusion because it does not address the communicative properties of stripes.
ac-D says "Ze…
@"Sky is the Limit" said:
Can someone explain to me what (E) is even saying?
I think the real flaw is that there is an assumption that failing to have a "proper" plan for an endeavor means the endeavor should no longer occur. Now if the stimulus…
@westcoastbestcoast said:
what is meant by auto emissions
So I must retract my earlier statement about including all the other stuff. Per my most recent post: Auto emissions are just auto emissions. Widespread use of electric powered cars will lea…
Ya know, it's funny. I believe I can also say that the the author doesn't disagree in any way with the proponents. ac-A carefully qualifies itself by stating the environmental impact "will" be worse than the proponents "may believe". So I think the …
@westcoastbestcoast said:
answer choice A seems to imply that rather than an abatement there won't be such reduction of auto emissions because of the detrimental emissions of the battery production process of the electric cars that they cite
It d…
@blah170blah said:
I would just advise keeping the nuance of "WONT NECESSARILY" in your mind
Yes. Because the statement Dog sick --leads to--> seeming tired and lazy is negated by allowing instances of sick dogs not seeming tired and lazy. So t…
In ac-A the author need not directly prove proponents wrong. The author is simply stating premises that lead to a conclusion that the proponents have not fully considered the added environmentally problematic consequences associated with widespread …
@notwilliamwallace I especially like your concern for negation. By definition if something "must be true" then its negation will directly contradict the stimulus.
@Euthyphro said:
the logical jump being made
Yes the assumption unstated is that "as a family" is less pervasive. But ac-A comes in and contradicts this assumption and weakens (perhaps destroys) the argument. Good analysis :-)
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-21/
ac-B doesn't have to be true because the detergent specially made for front loaders could very well dissolve more readily in a top-loader. In fact that would would make plenty good …
@david.busis said:
Tell each one up front that you're applying to law school, but ask if they'd be willing to reconnect.
What does this posed question mean? Do you wanna chat some more? Do we needto ask for the LOR in stages?
The longer you apply a flame to a vat of H20 the higher the temp. Vat A has had a flame applied for longer than vat B therefore Vat A is hotter. (Unless....perhaps... Vat A started with a block of ice and vat B started room temp). I think this is wr…
@quinnxzhang said:
This is not correct.
I agree... To negate the conditional is to say that the stated relationship does not exist. Applying the 'until' rule negate sufficient better clarifies the relationship (not deny it altogether).