HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| rc | 18K | 31.1K |
| study | 17.8K | 26.9K |
-
Two PTs a day?Hi, I'm aiming for September, 2017, and I'm lagging behind on my PTs. Would it be a good idea for me to start taking two PTs a day? (I'm currently ta…
... necessarily count on -0 LR & RC on test day and it ... -
Two PTs a day?Hi, I'm aiming for September, 2017, and I'm lagging behind on my PTs. Would it be a good idea for me to start taking two PTs a day? (I'm currently ta…
... necessarily count on -0 LR & RC on test day and it ... -
PT 74: is this PT difficult or what?So I just took it and completely bombed it. I found LR to be extremely difficult and it is a strong section for me. Anyone think this PT sucked or…
PT 74 was average for me on LR. RC however ripped me a new one. -
PT 74: is this PT difficult or what?So I just took it and completely bombed it. I found LR to be extremely difficult and it is a strong section for me. Anyone think this PT sucked or…
> @LSATcantwin said:
> PT 74 was average for me on LR. RC however ripped me a new one.
LG was cake, RC had 2 tough passages but I got through them. LR on the other had for me just like.. lol I feel like a complete idiot after that -
How to access PTs C, B, A, & F97?Hi there, I've finished all the prep-tests (35-81) but still want to try out some timed sections with questions I've had no exposure to. I just fo…
... clarify -- all of those questions (LR, RC, & LG) are untouched by ... -
Favorite LSAT section distribution?Hey all, Just wondering what yall's preferred distribution of the sections is on the LSAT! Mine is definitely: 1. LR 2. RC 3. LG 4. LR …
Hmmm... This is an interesting question!
My fav is:
1. LR
2. LG
3. LR
4. LG -
Favorite LSAT section distribution?Hey all, Just wondering what yall's preferred distribution of the sections is on the LSAT! Mine is definitely: 1. LR 2. RC 3. LG 4. LR …
LOL We are like twins! I definitely love to have LR RC LG LR!! -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
Can anyone confirm which LR was the ... expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... last question)
Also, for RC the judges was the real ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... br /> > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> Can anyone ... confirm which LR was the ... expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... question)
> Also, for RC the judges was the real ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> > Can ... anyone confirm which LR was ... expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... >
> That last LR was legit.
>
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> > & ... gt; Can anyone confirm which LR was ... the expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ...
> > That last LR was legit.
> > ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> > & ... gt; > Can anyone confirm which LR ... the expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... > > > That last LR was legit.
> > ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > > I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> > & ... gt; > > Can anyone confirm which LR ... expert. one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ...
Thanks. LG and RC have already been confirmed:
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LG--LR--LG--RC--LR
RC was really really hard. I ... had a mental breakdown. First LR for me was a bit ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Beating my head off the wall while I find out the judges RC was real. Like wow what the crap was that... I had LR, LG, LR, (break), LR, RC..Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR LG LR LR RC
Praying that the second LR was real since ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had an extra LR with a LR-LG-LR-LR-RC order. This was almost ... />
I felt like the LR sections were pretty fair, and ... /> I'm most concerned about RC for sure. I actually found ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> I had LR LG LR LR RC
> Praying that ... the second LR was real since it ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> > I had LR LG LR LR RC
> > Praying ... that the second LR was real since ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> I had LG--LR--LG--RC--LR
>
> ... ; RC was really really hard. I ... had a mental breakdown. First LR for me was a bit ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
LR - LG - LR - LR - RC
First two LR have 25 questions, and the ... other two.
First LR has a question on Stretching ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> I had LR LG LR LR RC
> Praying that ... the second LR was real since it ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > I had LG--LR--LG--RC--LR
> >
> > RC was really really hard ... had a mental breakdown. First LR for me was a bit ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
On my 2nd LR (3rd section) I had something about clerics exaggerating how religious peasants are, and I was wondering if you can help me figure out if this was the experimental section? Thanks in advance.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
How many different LR experimental sections are there? I ... light in space. I had LR-LG-LR-RC-LR I think? 1LR seemed ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> Had 3 lr sections. Does anyone know if ... />
Bumping, also i had LR LG LR LR RC
The lemurs ... was in in the 2nd LR for me (the 3rd section ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
>
> ... ; On my 2nd LR (3rd section) I ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Does anyone know if the order is the same even for matching section orders:
Example: I had LR LG LR LR RC
is my first LR the same as someone else's first LR that had this format as well?Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
If someone had:
LR - LG - LR - LR - RC - which LR was experimental?Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... had:
LR - LG - LR - LR - RC - which LR was experimental?> @JDtobeeee ... CrystalBoomBoom said:
> > LR - LG - LR - LR - RC
> >
> > LR - LG - LR - LR - RC
> >
