HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| rc | 18.1K | 31.1K |
| study | 17.8K | 27K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question distribution for LR was? Remember it being 25-26-26 for some reason. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question ... distribution for LR was? Remember it ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alone? -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... inside from this -27 on RC I'm about to get ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC
Really hoping the first section of LR ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... inside from this -27 on RC I'm about to get ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... gt; There was an RC experimental passage about abstract ... Yes-- I had 2 RC sections. The section with the ... LR section (3 LR sections) broken down as LR LG LR LR RC.
Btw-- RC ... as the 5th section after 2 LR ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... who didn’t have experimental LR remember a question about investment ... for me second of three LR sections and I’m wondering ... the experimental. My order was LR, LG, LR, LR, RC
It ...
