But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
How is is C the correct answer... I'm not seeing the connection. Someone please help!
The conclusion is "we can now dismiss the widely held suspicion that sugar consumption often exacerbates hyperactivity in children with attention deficit ...
... , 5 sections, and 1 to 38 grouped by types and difficulties ... " to drill from 1 to 38 since they have already broken ... "all" bundles involving 1 to 38. There wasn't an option ...
... reason is in lines (51-57), the more success and ... short lived. In lines (51-57) you can see that ... ’ve seen in lines (51-57) an authoritarian regime ... success brings their own demise (51-57) or something along ... the passage hint at this (51-60). It talks about ...
... the Cambridge LG packets (1-38), drill untimed some of the ... Cambridge LR (1-38), practice full sections RC timed ... LG sections of PT 1-38 timed in order to keep ... start going through PTs 1-38 RC sections timed and then ...
I am considering purchasing a course for 7sage. I was wondering which course packets include video explanations for answers to Logical Reasoning questions for PrepTests 1-38.