HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| a | 136.9K | 437.8K |
| most | 19.4K | 25.5K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
Some statementsHey im still confused after reviewing the CC again I know a some statement can be reversibly read but is there a way to negate it? For example:…
... again
I know a some statement can be reversibly ... />
For example:
A some B --- C
If I negate ... C, what does that do to ... -
Inferences... Help!I got some questions... Can someone help me find the inferences of following? . • M←/→N→O inference: I believe no inference can be made ….. or i…
... -m→/R
.
• A←s→B←/→C inference:
Again, I don ... …….. but some people say A←s→/C, /C←s→A...
.
.
.
How often should we use Lawgic language in LR?So it seems like for MSS, Main Point, and Weakening/Strengthening there doesn't seem to be much need for using Lawgic language (ex: A some B -> C, th…
... Lawgic language (ex: A some B -> C, therefore A some C). However, when it ... , Sufficient/Necessary Assumption there is a large need for Lawgic language ... of questions, or is there a strategy for this? Can Lawgic ...contrapositivesHey guys, i have a pretty simple question. How would you read the contrapositive of this chain: A Some B---> C? Thanks! :)
Hey guys, i have a pretty simple question. How would you read the contrapositive of this chain:
A Some B---> C?
Thanks! :)Conditional Logic HelpIn regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A a…
In regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A and B be in (I.e. at least one is in) or is it just either A or B, not both. Thank you!Question Regarding And + OrHi all! I just have a question regrading And + Or in the SC and NC and what happens when you Satisfy the SC through Valid Argument Form #1 and Deny …
... conclude C.
1. A and /B
2. B and /A
3. A and B ... /> A --> B and C
When you say /B and /C you conclude /A ... because B ...Embedded conditional helpHi. I need help with something. I know how embedded conditionals work. For example A---> (B---->C) then it becomes A and B ----->C But what hap…
... />
A---> (B---->C) then it becomes A and B ----->C
B/----->A/)----->C. Or conversely, C/------>(A----->B)
C/ and A---->B. Its a question from PT ...Truthness of Invalid ConclusionsHi, I have a question: Premise: A -m-> B --> C Invalid Conclusion: A --> C Is A --> C necessarily false? Or is it just not necessarily true?…
Hi, I have a question:
Premise: A -m-> B --> C
Invalid Conclusion: A --> C
Is A --> C necessarily false? Or is it just not necessarily true? Or do we simply not know?PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to..."-A --> -B"....right?
So, "Unless A OR B --> NOT C ... " would be diagrammed like "-A OR -B --> -C ...LOGIC QUESTIONI have a logic question I was wondering if you could help me with. So I was doing a MBF question on Test 41 section 1. Essentially, the stimulus g…
... get a contrapositive out of A (Most)-> B nor out of A B. ... A->B:
By inference we can say A (most)-> B ... By inference we can say ~B (most)-> ~A
By ... we cannot get a contrapositives from “most” conditionals and “some ...PT3.S2.Q07 - Those who participate in local politics...Can someone please explain why AC A is right? Is AC A right b/c "some" selfish opportunists to mean, out of all selfish opportunists in the world,…
Can someone please explain why AC A is right?
Is AC A right b/c "some" selfish opportunists to mean, out of all selfish opportunists in the world, only those who participated in local politics?Except/Without/Until and Demorgan'sI remembered a question that had something that basically said: A or B without C would that be translated as: /A and /B --> C (since you negate…
I remembered a question that had something that basically said: A or B without C
would that be translated as:
/A and /B --> C (since you negate the suff and change the or to and?)Conjunction vs Disjunction in Conditional StatementsI have a question regarding Conjunction and Disjunction when they’re present in the sufficient and/or necessary condition. I know “and” does not s…
I have a question regarding Conjunction and Disjunction ... if a statement says “A and B -> C” that we need both A and B ... said “A -> B and C”, does A being present mean both B and C must ... be present together as a ...Difference in Argument Structure : Help!Hi I was wondering if someone can give examples, and ways to tell a difference between the two argument structures, and how to tell them apart in a s…
... />
Premise: B Conclusion: A -> C (missing assumption: B -> C)
versus ...
Premise: A Conclusion: B->C (missing assumption: A-B).PT69.S4.Q16 - salespeople always steer customershttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-4-question-16/ Hey test-takers! If you have PT69, care to discuss this question with me? Upo…
... likelihood from a most statement. So if they give you A most B, and A occurs ... , they can conclude B is likely ... fine from a logical standpoint. (They often say that B occurs ... and then conclude that A is likely ...Logic Game Set UpI downloaded the Logic Game Cheat Sheet, but what about some language/word indicators of which kind of game it is. Hints, ideas? Appreciate it.
... /> A→ (B→C)
/A or (B→C)
/A or (/B or /C)
(/A or /B) or C
NOT [/A ... or /B] →C ...General Games discussion about notating rulesWhen notating rules in a game, is it advisable to NOT write down the contrapositive, but simply understand how it would work for a particular rule? O…
... simple conditionals (e.g. A -> B). You can get away with ... complex conditionals (e.g. A or B -> C) if you struggle with ... to make sure you understand a relationship.Causation - CorrelationHey guys! I've been meaning to ask if anyone could help me better understand this concept. I think I understand it but when I'm under timed condit…
... answer choices. I would spend a lot of time first:
a, then b; c requires d; etc) and then ... ) If you don't see a causal relationship, map out the ... .
It might take a while in the beginning but ...embedded conditionalsOk question on this. Lets say we have "if A then no B unless C". According to JY we can diagram as follows: A-->(B-->C) we pull the first term in…
"if A then no B unless C"
From what I ... B---> would become B
If A->B->C
If A ... and B ->C
Not C-> Not B->not A ?
Don ...LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... suggests that A→B and that C did NOT cause A and B. C isn’t ... necessary to establish that A ... causes B, but ...Games by 7Sagers: My Coffee Needs a Seat (April Fools Edition)@pseudonymous made this look REALLY easy. If you find any errors I will make you a custom meme or avatar of your choice. @"Al [^-^d]" @blah170blah @…
hmmm... e-a-d-b-c??? totally random but @nicole.hopkins a stab at the game as promised.NA question typesI was wondering if anyone has found a way that works best to approach these question types? If so, PLEASE share.
... require adding a conditional premise, filling in a gap, ... A --> C (no habitat means no tiger) OR B --> C ... have to be both A --> AND B--> C.
< ... br /> I'm not sure if that makes a ... . If you have a troublesome NA question in ...PT3.S2.Q04 - a work of architectureI'm having a hard time understanding how this answer choice follows logically from the premises.
... unfunctional buildings, but there's a key sentence the author provides ... /> That leads us to answer B: IF Strong personalities take over ... logic for both premises a and b
C. is too strong, and ... their work" to merely having a strong personality
D. ...PT74.S1.Q24 - any driver involved in an accidentSomeone please help... https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-24/
...
d. That's a tempting conclusion, because that's ... br /> A or B-->C Not C--->not A and not B. Injury or ... embedded conditional, and JY does a fantastic job explaining how to ... from the embedded conditional to a simple conditional.
https:// ...Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... this: "(A or B)---->(C and D)" One of A or B happening is ... sufficient to trigger both C and D ... .
So, (A or B) can happen while (C and D) doesn ... into lawgic:
(A or B) SOME Not (C and D).
Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... /> /C-->/A+/B
/D-->/A+/B
Split the necessary:
/C-->/A ...
/C ... -->/B
Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... (flip and negate) of (A or B)--->(C and D) is Not ... (C and D)---> Not (A or B ... true that (A or B)--->(C and D)," which means (A or B) is ... not sufficient for (C ...Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... 't say "(not) C or D ----> (not) A and B".
I ... and reverse.
For A or B--> C and D, negate and ...
Not (C and D) --> Not (A or B).
The next ... )
Not (A or B) becomes Not A and Not B. (OR in parantheses ...Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... :
A or B --> C and D Note: The A and B can split ... I see EITHER A or B, I know that BOTH C and D ... /> (not) C OR (not) D ---> (not) A AND (not) B
The ... the arrows coming off of A/B and leading to "C and D"Writing out logical equationsHey folks, For which question types in LR am I supposed to write out a logical equations (translating the stimulus)? And, for those question types…
Occasionally, for parallel method of reasoning questions, I denote variables with respective letters (e.g. A and B --> C). You still need to be careful that you don't mix these up, but I helps connect reasoning between different arguments.
