HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| a | 136.2K | 436K |
| or | 56.9K | 91.2K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| is | 102.8K | 239.1K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing? -
contrapositive of A or B but not both... Clarification plzI understood "A or B but not both" as one of the followings: 1. A(O) B(X) 2. A(X) B(O) 3. A(X) B(X) Then what is the contrapositive of it? …
... ) B(O)
3. A(X) B(X)
Then what is ... the contrapositive of it?
A/B = CONTRAPOSITIVE => /A + /B ?????
A and /B could fall under the definition of "A or B but not ... -
Without A or B means?Hi I was reviewing PT65.4.5. There is a sentence that says "The plaintiff has applied to the court for an order permitting her to question each defen…
... reviewing PT65.4.5. There is a sentence that says "The plaintiff ... to question each defendant without A OR B. I'm wondering whether I ... the it as without (A or B ), or (without A or without B ). The former should mean ... -
If A then B and C rewritten as if A and B then C??I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't …
I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't find that lesson anywhere and am not sure if I just made that rule up in my head. Is this lawgic logical? -
How do I get PT A or BHey guys, this might be a dumb question but does anyone know if you can get PT A or B on 7sage? I have the Ultimate+ prep. For some reason, I rea…
Hey guys,
this might be a dumb question but does anyone know if you can get PT A or B on 7sage? I have the Ultimate+ prep. For some reason, I really can't seem to find the test on 7sage -
Diagram Help: If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occurIf C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur Would the diagram look like /C > A or B or... /C > /A & /B or are those both wro…
If C does not occur, then A and B cannot both occur
Would the diagram look like
/C > A or B
or...
/C > /A & /B
or are those both wrong @.@ I'm so confused -
Negation of "A and B"I really don’t understand where this rule ” For conditionals, A and B negates to A → /B ” came from or how it would be applicable to the actual exam.…
... both A and B being true simultaneously, you’re positing that /B is a necessary ... condition of A and thus can’t ... conditional relationships as being A and B → C negated to /C → /A or /B as specified by ... -
/A some /B in English?is it Some are not A and not B? A --> C B --> C /A some /B I was trying to translate this into english and was having some trouble. for e…
is it Some are not A and not B?
A --> C
B --& ... gt; C
/A some /B ...
if you are not a force user, you are not ... not Jedi and Not Sith? ( /A some /B) is that correct? -
If and only ifHi all! While I was studying, I encountered "<-/->" sign, and started to wonder if it is interchangeable with "⇔/" . Since "⇔/" is a negation of …
... : /A⇔C = AC ????????
.
.
If we have A⇔/B = /A⇔B, then
A,/B (O ... )
/A,B (O)
A,B (X)
/A,/B (X ... the definition of AB? Either A or B is in, but not both? I ... -
OR statements diagrammingI have a sincere doubt on diagramming 'OR'.... A or B is it incorrect to diagram as A --> /B , B --> /A i know group 3 indicators are diagramme…
I have a sincere doubt on diagramming 'OR'....
A or B is it incorrect to ... diagram as A --> /B , B --> /A
A --> B , /B --> A
but ... -
"either or" "not both"**Stmt**: Either A or B is in the forest **Question**: Is "either or" and "exclusive or" here ? **My Answer**: No, because atleast 1 has to b…
**Stmt**: Either A or B is in the forest
**Question**: Is "either or" and "exclusive ... or" here ?
**My ... both" truth table is below.
A B not both
0 ... -
PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... A --> NOT B" is equivalent to..."-A --> -B"....right?
So, "Unless A OR B ... --> NOT C ... " would be diagrammed like "-A OR -B --> -C ... -
Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
The rule of thumb is that you can split "OR" in the sufficient ... necessary.
For "if A or B than C and D" you have two ... A or B happening triggers C and D.
So:
A-->C+D
B ... -
Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... ) of (A or B)--->(C and D) is Not (C and D)---> Not (A or B). This ... that (A or B)--->(C and D)," which means (A or B) is not sufficient for (C and ... D). It can also mean that (C ... -
Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... meaning of a statement is knowing how it can be true or false ... :
(/C or /D) implies (/A and /B)
Negation:
(A or B) and (/C or /D ... )
Note: The "negation" of the conditional is ... -
Conditional Logic HelpIn regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A a…
The only unacceptable world for /C —-> A or B is for both A and B to be out. So it could be true that either A or B is in, or both are in? -
⚖ Official July 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread ⚖Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official July 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the July 2019 LS…
... up. The good news is that I do feel like ...
And there was a doozy of a parallel flaw, which I ... something like: If A or B then C, if C or D then E. ... Therefore sometimes E and not B or ... regroup and recharge in a month or so...talk to you ... -
Quick conditional question on contraspositivesHello Everyone, I wanted to know that if A -> B + C (with the + being "and") Then the Contra would be /B or /C -> /A And in another situ…
...
A and B —> C
Contrarily if “OR” is in the ... outcome (If A then B or C ... /> A—> B or C
If “OR” is in the trigger (If A or B then C) then ... -
Should I go back to LG Core Curriculum? Advice to get LG from -4-ish to -0 consistently?I've taken the LSAT once so far and scored (what I estimate to be) a -3. On PTs, I generally get anywhere from -1 to -5, with an average of -4 in a n…
... game pieces and 1 is placed on the board ... either A or B is in spot 6. then the next rule says C ... cannot be in spot 1. There are only a ... A & B because 1 game piece is placed and we know C is ... But Pure grouping is a common game to split or partial split. -
Need someone to explain why splitting 'or' sufficiency is okayIn the lesson about and/or sufficiency splits, JY says we split the 'or'. But in another lesson we learn that two sufficient conditions pointing to o…
If A or B, then C:
A or B-> C
Think about what ... we know if it is A ... statement (If A or B, then C) into two separate statements. A-> C ; B-> C
Demorgan Law: HelpJust some Confusion on statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example how would I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like …
... statement with both "and" and "or" in the stimulus. For example ... I draw a conditional statement with a stimulus like "If A or B than C and ... as well. may be a dumb question but having trouble ... out, especially while splitting the 'or" in the Sufficient and the ...Except/Without/Until and Demorgan'sI remembered a question that had something that basically said: A or B without C would that be translated as: /A and /B --> C (since you negate…
I remembered a question that had something that basically said: A or B without C
would that be translated as:
/A and /B --> C (since you negate the suff and change the or to and?)Except, Without, UntilI have heard before that for except without until you are supposed to negate the necessary condition and the sufficient condition and turn it into th…
... , "A will occur unless B occurs", I think of it as B is necessary ... for stopping A (or B is necessary for not A). That would be (not) A ... -> B
Quick De Morgan's Law QuestionI was wondering if anyone could help me out here. Always had trouble understanding this concept. 1. Say I am negating [<b>A and B</b>]. I know thi…
... only time that "or" is not inclusive is when they specifically ... or other rules/games setup preclude "both" from happening.
A is ... in Paris or London (definitely not both ... : There are no ties. A or B is third -->not both, ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... not state that. It said "A or B, but not both." Your ... would have said, "One of A or B is selected, but not both." The ... an exclusive or, which is the same thing as "if A, then /B." I ... initial post meant "One of A or B is selected, but not both," which ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... not, states that "one of A or B is selected, but not both" in ... the exclusive or, where the option of selecting neither is possible. And ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... or arena, the definition of the "or" is at most one. However, this is ... . What I was saying is LSAC does not tend to ... of A or B is selected, but not both." This is because the latter is more ... specific in nature than "A or B, but ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... or arena, the definition of the "or" is at most one. However, this is ... A or B is selected, but not both." This is because the latter is ... more specific in nature than "A or B, ... suggests zero options being true is a possibility. If we had ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... "A or B, but not both" the possibility of having NONE of A or B is not ... inclusive or:
A or B
A is true and B is true = true
A is ... true and B is false ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... /> A or B is /A-->B and /B-->A
there are three possibilities:
A, /B
B,/A ... situation is /A,/B
but, the A or B, but not both,
A/B or B/cynthia.wu82 June 2017 Logical Reasoning