Does anyone have any suggestions on how to better approach the Argument Part Questions? I feel like they are "freebies" yet giving me a hard time. #help
I don't get the correct answer choice for this question. Initially, I thought the argument part is the background problem that the stimulus is resolving. Let me know your thoughts on how to get to the right answer.
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation.
... impose on the argument, not ones that the argument **actually makes**. ... Sometimes the assumption the argument makes happens to also be ...
Are there times an argument actually makes an assumption that ... within a stimulus or argument that’s unrelated or ...
I'm having so much difficulty with these types of problems (which argument is most similar to the structure of the paragraph), does anyone have any advice for these?
... curriculum, the way JY teaches Argument Part questions, he tells us ... an "assumption" role in the argument if it is explicitly stated ... to ever have a correct Argument Part answer choice reference an ...
Sometimes, the counting of/accounting of assumptions can get ... contextual information to a possible argument. So how does our ... deal with other people's argument? Our author says: ... rooted assumption operating within this argument. Instead, as lawyers, we ...
So an argument that would express the flaw ... incompetent? We know in this argument that Congleton took action which ... of the actual argument and what Congleton wanted, thus accounting for the ...