It used to be like that, where 1-10 were easier. Now, the test writers can put (and WILL, from recent trends) harder questions in the first 1-10 to throw you off your game.
Just curious, what are the PTs that are "worth doing"? Is that okay that I do them chronologically from oldest to newest from now to Oct test date? Eg: 3xPT/week from PT 44-75
How are your PTs coming along? I've been aiming for Oct test but seeing my scores plateauing low 160s, I may have to postpone to Dec. I'll most likely apply to UBC, U of T (only if I can improve on my score), Osgood and maybe Uvic.
... now, I'm doing 2 recentPTs per week. What should I ... drill entire sections of old PTs? Should I give myself less ... when drilling sections or taking PTs? Any help is so appreciated ...
I'd save at least 5 of the more recentPTs for December/January and just start over with the PTs you have taken to extract even greater learning from the retakes. Just remember that BR is even more important that second time around.
... I've done roughly 20 PTs all over the place since ... rough rate of 2-3 PTs a week), going in a ... the cutoff between "old" and "recent" PTs is? Just in the interest ...
Thanks for you clarification. So does that mean that, before June test, there is no specific BR group for September test takers? Instead, September test takers will just jump in on these more recentPTs whenever they want?