I don't know why but I always struggle with Flaw questions and get 50% of them wrong all the time. It's just not clicking! Does anyone have any tips that worked for them? Anything would be appreciated.
For sampling flaw type, when we say the sample is large enough, what is the amount in usual?
For instance, for 100 sample, it's enough.
What about 50? Is there a specific amount that we consider to be enough for the survey to be not biased?
... a good way to explain flaw/descriptive weakening questions and how ... always fail to identify the flaw made in the argument and ... ways to point out the flaw and there are diff types ... helps you to understand the flaw in the argument?? thank you ...
Hello! I have gone through the syllabus on Parallel Flaw questions and I am still not getting it. On my drills I seem to keep missing those and wasting time trying to solve them. Any tips? Help is much appreciated!
... pre-phrasing and answering flaw questions that do not ... questions that assert a flaw with the assumption made ... author's argument. The flaw being the presumption that ... Take a look at the flaw questions below, but treat ... the presumption of its truth in one of the ...
... if you're consistently missing flaw and necessary assumption questions, ... time on the trickier flaw and NA question and potentially ... speed up parallel and parallel flaw questions).
However, ... ve never seen before, and truth be told, we have ...
I think ... commit the part to whole flaw that it is referencing. ... as proof of truth/falsity of a statement" flaw would still exist ... are wrong." Really, this flaw is about concrete characteristics, though ...
@c.janson35 hit the nail on the head. The flaw is that the political commentator's claims are false because people BELIEVE them to be false, which can not be properly concluded. Widespread opinion does not equate to the truth.
... would be found in a truth table. Based on the ... . So, NOT (loss of belief--->disappear) would mean that ... a loss of belief occurred but something did ... a jump from loss of belief and disappearing to not ... because of a loss of belief.
This is ...
... believe in Santa, but their belief is not true (sadly). It ... thing to assign a truth value to a belief than to say ... true that someone has a belief.
I could believe ... my belief, if we were to assign a logical truth/falsity to ...
... have yet to explain the flaw in my argument. If it ... is indeed a flaw as common as you say ... made an argument for my belief in response to your original ...
... We have to find the flaw in the lawyer's ... just doesn't describe a flaw in the argument. This ... : This is also a flaw. What if the witness ... consequence or inference of the belief. Maybe she actually wasn ... : This is also a flaw. Just because the lawyer ...
... a premise means denying the truth of the statement. "Knocking out ... cites "unrepresentative sample" as a flaw? In fact, isn't that ... exactly the flaw in question here? How can ... something be a flaw but not subject an argument ...
... a premise means denying the truth of the statement. "Knocking out ... uses "unrepresentative sample" as a flaw?
>
> ... uses "unrepresentative sample" as a flaw?
>
> ... it would be a "sampling" flaw because of the way the ...
... the study sucks __accepts the truth of the statement__ and then ... very different from __denying the truth of the statement__: "No, the ... a way which makes that truth unsupportive of the conclusion. flaw being conducted in the stimulus ...