Well since the same people hopefully created the Feb 2014 LSAT, I was wondering how you guys felt about the Dec 2013 LSAT? I found it to be reasonably well. Nothing too crazy. Any one else?
... premises, we can conclude the same "B some C" relationship. Though ... the first part is the same "A-->C", the second ... ". So, we should have the same conclusion for "B some C ...
... premises, we can conclude the same "B some C" relationship. Though ... the first part is the same "A-->C", the second ... ". So, we should have the same conclusion for "B some C ...
how to indicate this logic "A and B cannot be selected together",
is it "A->/B" correct? or sth. else?
then it will be the same as "not both" rule?
really confused...