i think it depends on the person and the game. for me personally, i started off by splitting the game board every time. through trial and error i developed an instinct, for lack of a better word, for when i should or shouldn't split the game board.
... my intuition about splitting boards was going through board set ups for ... and writing out every conceivable board combination with the pieces. The ...
... my intuition about splitting boards was going through board set ups for ... and writing out every conceivable board combination with the pieces. The ...
... is best represented by splitting the game board, then split the game ... board. If the information is best ... typically look to split my board on conditional rules wherever it ... the rule to the game board.
... possible. This may mean splitting your board or just representing rules directly ... on your master game board, but anytime you can make ... left of my paper, my board next to the pieces, and ...
... board correctly (if it was a game that was apt for splitting ... , opportunities to split your board, better ways to represent ... didn't split my board even though it probably ... didn't draw your board in an optimal way. ... argue, I set the board up better than JY... ...
... in the middle of the board “ __ __ ___ l ___ ... />
Essentially, if you establish a board up front, let the end ... the bench mark and the board hen recording of the rules ...
I just noticed this go live in the last few minutes as I was checking two questions from PT 57, Game 4. I can now check the board, and then fast forward directly to the question I need.