You can never ever conclude causation from correlation, but correlation does make causation more likely. Therefore, additional correlation can strengthen an argument.
... correlation in the premise and causation in the conclusion. We observed ... correlation in the premise to causation in the conclusion. Now, this ...
... in the conclusion that **_assumes_** causation. The basic framework for this ... cause these accidents (assumption of causation)
-Conclusion:If you take ... did not catch the correlation/causation framework in this problem, there ...
> @twssmith said:
> The bane of my LSAT existence...
> Crushing every time I heard JY on his videos say that the Question was a Cookie Cutter Causation...
I've only done PT70-74 and PT78, but I don't find a big difference from the ones in the earlier PTs. Could you give us an example of a question that gave you trouble?