... law school students are K-JD and the vast majority are ... lawyers or something close (think JD advantage). You, as a non ... />
http://www.lsac.org/jd/lsat/your-score/law-school ...
... />
Most law prof have a JD but not PhD (note a ... JD by itself def not enough ... at your campus have a JD but no PhD but have ... to teach? Because if a "JD by itself is def not ...
... academia...) just that a JD is bad if you are ... someone who is doing a JD/PhD (half finished with ... cuff... 1) because the JD aspect costs money... 2) ... said... a sightly below par JD (for academia purposes) can ... eg. Jon Klick (his JD was from George Mason - not ...
Per the LSAC's website, the scores should be released via email by January 5. They do say that their listed dates are just estimates, so who knows...
http://www.lsac.org/jd/lsat/test-dates-deadlines/2015-2016/us-canada-dec
If you get the right LSAT score nobody gives a shit about WE. Most law students are K-JD and most of them have little to no WE. Just study and take care of your family and you'll be fine.
I know most school will only consider the highest score. But will a low school be big treat if I want to go to school like Harvard, Yale and Columbia in the future. If so, will it be a better chance to cancel score instead of keeping a low score?