Hi!
I'm based in Manhattan, and I'm interested in starting a study group for the upcoming February 2018 LSAT starting this week. I would like a group of people who already have a grasp of the fundamentals, but anyone is welcome.
I'm using ...
... thinner the air. Since Mexico City’s altitude is higher than ... that of Panama City, the air must be thinner ... in Mexico City than in Panama City.” I have looked ...
... serious a problem for the city as the mayor claims it ... serious a problem for the city as the mayor claims it ... of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it ... of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it ... of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it ...
... to work on combating the city's zombie epidemic.', isn't ... to work on combating the city's zombie epidemic' conveying the ... to work on combating the city's zombie epidemic' would? that ...
The conditional logic here is really bugging me. It seems, with the benefit of knowing the answer, that the beginning of the stimulus ("The law") implies a bi-conditional? That is the only way I can see how C is a ...
I should clarify I am confused about the negations! How does it result that from a statement such as "All cats are black" to Neg Some cats /black OR (this is the one I'm confused about)... cats and /black. I don't understand the "and"?
Hello, all! Can you suggest how to effectively parse sentences? I understand that every sentence is unique in its structure, but is there a universal, generic application or set of steps that can help in parsing ? Thanks.