HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| if | 76.5K | 135.1K |
| a | 136.9K | 437.8K |
| then | 29.6K | 42.4K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| unless | 3.8K | 4.2K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
-
Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
Thank you... Then what do you think the ... .
If few A are B
= (1) Some A are B
+ (2 ... A are /B)
(no A are B ) + (Half or less A are /B)
(A -> /B ... -
Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
... :
> Thank you... Then what do you think the ... /> > If few A are B
> = (1) Some A are B
> ... (Some A are B ) + not (Most A are /B)
> (no A are B ) + ... Can anyone help :( ?
Then what about the negation...? Am ... -
Can I treat "few" as same as "some" and "many"?Remember in "Some and Most Relationship" lesson, JY mentions that "some" and "many" can be used interchangeably because they both have subjective def…
> Then what about the negation...? Am ... A are /B ??????
A-->/B
50% or less of A-->/B ... "most" statement because if we have 100 As, then the maximum number ... of this out loud so if someone disagrees, please let me ... -
PT44.S4.Q8 - Insurgent political parties that are profoundlyI couldn't pick any of the answer choices in PT44.S4.Q8. Can someone clarify if my understanding is ok? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-4…
... issues of their own.
(C), the phrase "will not always ... a solution, only mentions a requirement.
So (B), what would happen if ... were never addressed. If anything, like (B), it was a necessity for the ... -
..
... /> /A some /B
/C ---> /A
/C ---> /B
________________
/A ... if I apply your example to the form (A ---> C, B ---> C thus /A ... some /B), it would be ... -
..
... : A ---> C
> Premise 2: B ---> C
> Conclusion: ~A some ~B ... : A ---> C
> Premise 2: B ---> C
> Conclusion: ~A some ~B ... /> Controposing this gives FURTHER problems if you understand what contrapositive really ... -
Question on DeMorgan’s Law TheoryAccording to DeMorgan's Law Theory, And becomes Or when contrapositive. Correct? Then, I wonder why A if and only if A (AB = A->B AND B->A) bec…
"If and only if" is a biconditional statement
AB ( ... /> Ex. A **or** B ---> C
becomes
C ---> A **and**B -
neither norIf, "neither P nor K are cute", then can you say P+K→/C or do you have to keep them separate?? Lawgical Translations: P → /C AND K → /C Ther…
... an "either or" statement with a negation applied to it
@Freddy_D
I have a sense that "'neither nor' is ... an 'either or' statement with a negation applied to it", but ... ". So if we have "Neither P nor K are C", then it would ... -
Chronic bubbling errorsHi all, I have an issue that is beyond frustrating. Approximately 50% of the PT's I take, I make between 1--3 bubbling errors. Obviously, this is …
... (i.e, "#10 - C, #11 - D, #12 - A" etc). This has helped ... use a bubbling sheet when you do your drill work? If not, then ... causing these bubble errors, especially if you are double checking? -
neither norIf, "neither P nor K are cute", then can you say P+K→/C or do you have to keep them separate?? Lawgical Translations: P → /C AND K → /C Ther…
... shouldn't put "and" as a replacement. However, it's okay ... "and or = inclusive or" in a replacement for "neither nor" because ... ". So if we have "Neither P nor K are C", then it would ... →/C AND K→/C:
> When [_]? Then [_]
> P? /C ...
