... word "because" is a good indicator word to identify premises and ... "only," since "only" is a logicalindicator. As we have learned, "only ... is helped by using the indicator word like "because." You also ...
... "any" wouldn't be the logicalindicator. You can't really diagram ... any I outlined. So the logicalindicator would have to be another ... />
Have can be a logicalindicator like this:
... specifically says there is no logicalindicator in this sentence and he ... a stand in for a logicalindicator just to help with the ... can use "have" as the indicator in this case: because it ... that "any" is not a logicalindicator in this sentence is because ...
@lenelson2 said:
This might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT question?
... group 3 and group 4 logical indicators appear in the same ... "until" as the group 3 indicator and "not" as the negation ... "not" as the group 4 indicator and "until" as the negation ... to use "until" as the logicalindicator and use "not" as the ...
There is a group 2 indicator (only) and a group 4 indicator (cannot) in that sentence. So you can use either one, but generally it's easier to use group 4 indicators as negations and use the other one as the logicalindicator.
... " and "Philadelphia" come after the logicalindicator "always", what you want to ... word comes **immediately** after the logicalindicator. In this case, it's ...