Wondering how all of you drilled valid and invalid argument forms. Wondering if I should make a quizlet, make myself a quiz? Wanted to know the most effective way and seek advice :) thanks so much
A valid conclusions is a conclusions that's already 100% proven by it's premises. Can these questions ever be strengthened or weakened? Or do strengthening and weakening questions always have a stimulus with some error
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation.
I just did the skill builder for drawing valid conclusions 1 and I can't wrap my head around it at all is there any other better more in depth explanation for it?
... If sufficient fails then no valid conclusions about the necessary condition ... hence we can have a valid conclusion.
If ... hence we can have a valid conclusion, but if necessary ... valid conclusion.
... thinking is, is it valid, yes or no. What ... quickly review both the valid and invalid argument forms, ... a copy of the valid & invalid forms printed ... 't just try to memorize and regurgitate. Understand the ... that it translates into a valid or invalid form.
I feel that the easiest way to memorize these forms is to actually make flash cards and go over them a couple of times. I did this about 5 times in a row & I was able to recognized all valid & invalid forms afterwards.
Yes! Make sure you memorize those lessons! They will be very helpful soon, especially once you get to PTs. Also, valid and invalid argument types. CRUCIAL information to memorize and know when to spot it out.
... 's lessons on conditional logic, valid/invalid argument forms. To me ... mental note of all the valid and invalid argument forms as ... are what got me there. Memorize them!
Yeah you are correct--you can conclude that. It really helped me to hone in and memorize the combinations of some and most intersections so that when I went to a stimulus, I was able to immediately see what forms were valid and which ones were not.