In conditional-heavy games, when a question stem introduces a new temporary conditional, I have trouble linking this to the master chain, especially if it's already completed.
... is assuming, and necessarily so. Negating it makes a mockery of ... on necessary assumption questions, because negating a "most" statement just takes ... ) to 50% (or less), so negating a "most" assumption does virtually ...
I am barely getting these questions correct and i am about to give up. Could someone please tell me your methods for approaching these questions cause negating isnt working for me.
When I do Necessary Assumption Question, I prefer to negate the Answer Choice and then test whether the argument becomes invalid. But this question confused me. Can anybody help me explain the question by negating and testing?