HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| neither | 608 | 690 |
| a | 136.2K | 436K |
| nor | 961 | 1.1K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
-
BiconditionalsPerhaps I missed something as I do not remember a lesson on biconditionals (double arrows). My understanding is that each term is both sufficient…
... B in the absence of A:
> Except when A, B.
> /A ... --> B
B.
> When A, not B
> A --> /B
Are these arguments valid?**Most beers in are cans. Most cans contain beer.** Conclusion: The number of beers is not greater than double nor fewer than half the number of can…
... C
C most B
B most A
The ... C some A rather than B some A, since C and A both link ... back up to B ... and solidify this, but A most B most C doesn't yield ... but if it were A most B-->C then you ...Are these arguments valid?**Most beers in are cans. Most cans contain beer.** Conclusion: The number of beers is not greater than double nor fewer than half the number of can…
... drawing the inference C some A.
That inference ... their own.
B most C
B most A
Therefore ... :
C some A
A--most-->B if that makes it ...Are these arguments valid?**Most beers in are cans. Most cans contain beer.** Conclusion: The number of beers is not greater than double nor fewer than half the number of can…
... />
I understand that A ----Most---> B ---Most---->C cannot ... adding the additional premise, B --Most--->A:
http://i ... most A's are B's, most B's are A's, most B's ... are C's, but no A ...Group 3 Logical Indicators problemsJust started Group 3 Logical Indicators, and I'm confused. I'm not confused about the process (or at least I don't think I am). With Group 3 Indicato…
... "group" indicators is to take a more complicated/complex sentence, and ... translate it into a very easy and simple "if ... . Everyone knows what "if A, then B" means. So the indicators are ... just helping you take a ...PT8.S4.Q09 - it can safely be concludedSo I am still working on figuring out SA questions. I came across this question the other day in drills and have no idea how the correct answer conne…
... have two circles, A and B. A is within B. So we know that ... A is also a part of B. Thus, we have a conditional statement: A --> B ... . So within A ...blind review is my best friend...hey all, just wanted to share a bit of my experience... after completing the core curriculum i was eager to jump into prep-tests. at first i wou…
... at these is to do a lot of them unfortunately.
A or B.
That list ...Give an example?Hey Everyone, Could anyone give me an example (whether on some test or just an example you could make up) of this valid form: A --> C B --> …
Give an example?Hey Everyone, Could anyone give me an example (whether on some test or just an example you could make up) of this valid form: A --> C B --> …
... /> > > A --> C
> > B --> C
> > ~A some ~B
> >
> ... ..."
It sounds like ~A and ~B --> /C
Give an example?Hey Everyone, Could anyone give me an example (whether on some test or just an example you could make up) of this valid form: A --> C B --> …
... ; >
> > > A --> C
> > ... ; > B --> C
> > ... ; --------------
> > > ~A some ~B
> > >
> It sounds like ~A and ~B --> /C
> ...What does "or else" mean in sequencing games?Hey guys, Had a 7Sager email me with a question that I thought you guys could help out with. Here it is: ------------------------------------- …
It's just an inclusive or. If not A, then B = If not B, then A. At minimum one must be present.PT1.S4.Q21 - a society in which there are many crimesI am Completely stumped on this question. I am not sure if I am correctly negating the statement nor understanding the some relationship here Stim…
...
Answer Choice
(A) L->C; incorrect we ... according to the stimulus
(B) /C->/L; incorrect; ... this either.
(A) and (B) are logical equivalents to each ... The answer choice is stating a many relationship. So thinking in ...Causation in Relation to Weaken/StrengthenSo I’m really struggling with these causation questions, not because I'm getting the wrong answer, but because I’m confused about Causation strategy,…
... up directly. So yes while a understanding what JY is saying ... just say an argument concludes A causes B. We know from the ...BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... like this
A -> /B and B->/A,
If you just ... /> if A is in B is out. And if B is in A is ... /> /A---->B and /B--->A
This means if A is out out B ... can be written as:
A/B and B/A
I hope ...BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
... the inverse of the statement A or B but not both like ... 1, A or 2, not A and we either have 1, B or ... 2, not B. The ... for one of the variables**(A or B ) **to occur** (and ... have A then we cannot have B; it's a bit of a paradoxical ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... . If A, then not B is represented as A----->/B ( B----->/A) and A or B ... , but not both is /A----->B ( /B----->A ...advanced formal logic some and most inferenceHi guys, I am confused with a logic inference. According to a book, if A, then not B, can be notated like A-->/B or A<-|->B. However, in 7sage, i…
... a Bi-conditional. If A then not B is a not both rule: A ---> B ... , for it's not clear if it's required for A ... "If...then..." is a conditional itself. The ... this statement does not equate a bi-conditional.
Sami gave you a much more detailed breakdown ...BiconditionalsHi guys, I'm going through the biconditional part of the curriculum. Im wondering, for the Or, but not both biconditional, why don't we just write it…
A -->/B means "not both" so A and B could both be out. If A is OUT, sufficient condition fails and B could be OUT or IN.
A/B means "always apart, never together" so they cannot be out together. If A is OUT, B has to be IN.is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... of an inclusive or. The "A or B, but both both" is ... is diagrammed as the following: A --> /B (B--> /A).is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... possibilities in the biconditional: (A) (B) (/A) (/B)
Biconditional (A/B CP: /AB) Remember these ... if A not B (A->/B CP: B->/A)
If A is chosen B cannot ... be
If B ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... possibilities in the biconditional: (A) (B) (/A) (/B)
> Biconditional (A/B CP: /AB) Remember ... equivlent
> If A is chosen, B cannot be
> ... if A not B (A->/B CP: B->/A)
> If A is chosen B ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... not state that. It said "A or B, but not both." Your ... have said, "One of A or B is selected, but not both ... the same thing as "if A, then /B." I am assuming that ... initial post meant "One of A or B is selected, but not ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... br /> A or B
A B
A B
A B
A B
...
The last possibility (A B ... A and B
A B
A B
A B
A B
The last possibilit…is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... of an inclusive or. The "A or B, but both both" is ... diagrammed as the following: A --> /B (B--> /A).
I'm ... referencing the "A or B, **not both ... 'm saying "If A, then not B" and "A or B, but not both ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... , satisfied, etc. Simply stating A or B, requires by its very definition ... at least one of A or B.
I think ... , but in the original statement "A or B, but not both" there ... the case that A implies B" as opposed to "A implies B," which, I ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... specific as in "One of A or B is selected, but not ... more specific in nature than "A or B, but not both." Anyways ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... specific as in "One of A or B is selected, but not ... more specific in nature than "A or B, but not both." Anyways ... zero options being true is a possibility. If we had "not ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... that when you simply state, "A or B, but not both" (The ... an assumption (that "must" is a necessary part of that statement ... LSAT. Now, I'm not a logician, so I don't ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... when you simply state, "A or B, but not both" ( ... (that "must" is a necessary part of that statement ... proposition "A is true"?
So "A or B, but ... not both" = "A is true or B is ... meaning of the symbol, "A or B".
TheLSAT ...Inclusive or exclusive 'or'How do we tell the difference between an inclusive 'or' (group 3 rules) or an exclusive 'or' (can be negated to mean 'and')?
... "I'm going to meet A or B", this means "I'm ... going to meet A or B or both" unless specifically ... that says "or both." (A or B or both). But this "or ... says:
> A will either take a leave from her company ... t think she can take a leave once she quits: Q ...
