Search

Word	Docs	Hits
not	65.1K	113.8K
reading	10.5K	15.3K
all	46K	66.5K
lr	21.4K	37.5K
answers	7.1K	9.6K

#help with answer strategies/not reading all choices vs. reading allAt what point should you feel comfortable that you have "mastered" a particular approach to a LR question type, so that you no longer need to review …
IS All As are not Bs=Not all As are B RIGHT?Is this right? And what is the meaning of No As are Bs? Are these three sentence the same one? Thx.
Moving on without reading all answers on LR (and RC)Hi @Juliet-- , and all, I know typically it is best i have heard to read all answer choices for LR to make sure you are correct and not being tricked…
The Hardest LR Question of All Time - Preptest 29 Number 17 LR Studies of the reliability of eyewitnOk, I am joking about this being the hardest LR question of all time. Of course, there have been harder questions, but for some reason, this one took…
LR: Do you all read all the answer choices or move on once you think you found the right AC?Hey, I generally read all the answer choices, but I thought it would save time if not. So, I am essentially asking is it better to be safe than sorry…
How to stop careless reading mistakes in LR + reading stimuli in the same way as in RC?One of the biggest issues I have is not reading the sentences in the stimuli carefully...<br /> Do you have any suggestions to prevent such mistakes…
Okay, is the issue reading faster, working more efficiently, drilling more LR or all three?LR is absolutely smacking me. I have done aprox. 30 PT with the most recent one being Being PT46. On the early PT i was scoring 165-172. But as the p…
Where can we review/see all the answers to all PTIs there any site/resource where we can see explanations for all the practice tests?
I am going not finishing all questions in lr...I just started taking timed sections, and I am spending about 3 minutes per question in LR,( obviously too much time). Am I screwed? I feel down and …
"Some not...." "Not all"I'm looking at the question stimulus and one of the wrong answers and wondering if these two mean exactly the same thing: <br /> <br /> "**Not all*…

Title Search @title beer Word 'beer' in title	User Search @user admin Only posts by Admin	Text Search @body beer Word 'beer' in the text
Phrase Search "Hello World" Exact phrase match	Exclude Terms car -red Search cars that are not red	"Or" Searches honda \| bmw 'honda' or 'bmw' results
Multi-Field @(title,body) hello Both contain 'hello'	WildCard hond* civ* Match all with an astrix	Combination @title bmw @user admin

See more supported syntax examples

How to Improve on TimingI am currently finishing the section in about 36.45 minutes. I have just started drilling RC today after realising my issue with the timing. When I…

... for it.
3) Check answers, correct any reasoning issues.
all the answers correct within the time ... set for myself (if incorrect answers, I may consult my BR ...

Victoria-1 September 2017 Reading Comprehension
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

> @"Dillon A. Wright" said:
> What experimental did you guys have? @jackigoe @HesusChrist

Reading comp. LR was legit.

HesusChrist September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

...
>
> Reading comp. LR was legit.

Did ...

inactive September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

... ; >
> > Reading comp. LR was legit.
>

HesusChrist September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

... ;
> > > Reading comp. LR was legit.
> > ...

inactive September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

... /> > > > > Reading comp. LR was legit.
> > ...

HesusChrist September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

... ; > > > > Reading comp. LR was legit.
> > ...

inactive September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Please confirm "Beads and Gold" and "Homophones" as questions if you did **NOT** have experimental LR.

inactive September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

... questions if you did **NOT** have experimental LR.

I can ... currency question and I did not have a logical reasoning experimental

lawschoolhopeful1996 September 2017 September 2017 LSAT
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

> @"Dillon A. Wright" said:
> Please confirm "Beads and Gold" and "Homophones" as questions if you did **NOT** have experimental LR.

Confirmed (I had 2 RC)

ZaTabler September 2017 September 2017 LSAT

HitBox

Related Threads

Related Searches

How to Improve on TimingI am currently finishing the section in about 36.45 minutes. I have just started drilling RC today after realising my issue with the timing. When I…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…

Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…