... in violation. This is the flaw. He is saying that allowing ... sufficient condition, necessary condition confusion flaw. Because in reaching the conclusion ...
If the stimulus is formal logic and does not mention the word "should" and an AC is almost identical but uses the word "should" [i.e. "A" should be exercised only to "B" or to "C"] is this enough to disqualify it?
IMO it should be enough bc if the ...
One that, "appeals to a premise one would accept only if one already accepted the truth of the conclusion." I know there is a circularity in it, but can someone give an example, in non-abstract lsat language for me? That would be amazing lol thanks!!!!!!!
... please elaborate what such a flaw is? I don't think ... 've seen this type of flaw description before. In S3 Q18 ... that can illustrate what this flaw would look like?
So, I write an exam on Monday for a job opening for which I'm applying. I wrote a practice test this afternoon to get a feel for the test; apparently, I overthought the following question that appeared on the test.