I thought I would get lucky and find most of the RC sections from PT1-38 on 7Sage since I've been drilling from the Cambridge packets. Unfortunately they're not all in the ultimate course :(
... I am mainly drilling sections PT1-35 for the next couple ... drilled a LR section from PT1 and found it to be ... wasting my time focusing on 1-16?
... .
However, I began doing PT1-16 four days ago, and ... that I now have a -1/-3 for these older PTs ... />
I haven't got to PT 36-83 yet. Could anyone ... those PTs (as compared to PT1-35)?
Thanks!
PT1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game ... />
PT 13: PT 14: PT 15: PT 16: Game 1, ... Game 2, Game 3 PT ... Game 4 PT 19: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3 ... Game 4 PT 20: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3 ...
Finished CC. Just did PT1 today. I'm hoping to ... enough time to practice all PT1-35 AND the more recent ... I at least do from 1-35 before moving onto the ...
... and I have just finished PT1-20. My scores are about ... 170. I’ve heard that PT 50 + are considerably harder, and ... PT 80+ are even more challenging. ... ask how your scores in PT1-20 compare to those in ...
I found many Level 5 questions from PT1-35 not only difficult but annoyingly silly. Also, looks like many do not even have an explanation video on this forum?
... am really confused I think PT1S3 Q07 has answer mistake.< ... are three components 1,2, 4
( 1,2 both belong ... us quantity comparison of 1,2,4 they are ... in greater proportion than 1 because the ratio of ... A/B= west/east 1=young male 2 =old male ...
Can anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me crazy.
Why is B wrong? The stimulus clearly states "**any**given individual molecule of substance can activate..." how is this statement not supporting B?
And how can C be ...
Is anyone able to explain this question to me? I am horrible with proportions/math/etc, and I don't understand why my answer was wrong or why the right one is right. Thank you!!
#Help
Hey! Just browsing LR forum posts and saw no one responded to this. I wrote an explanation here: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/26042/pt-1-s3-q18-please-help
... permit is obtained by Feb 1 OR some of the other ... equivalent to...."-obtained my Feb 1 OR -less time --> -completed ... title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ...
... late January starting with PT 44 and finished PT 61 today (I ... , I did one timed PT on a weekend day and ... been good luck with RC (-1), Games (-1/-2) and performing better ... should re-do the basic PT1-35 drills or focus on ... re-doing the PT 44-61 etc) would ...
Of course, I plan to print out/BR PT 36-83, but I was curious about what is the best use for PTs 1-35 since many of the questions have already been taught.
... -proofing logic games from tests 1-35, for a little while ... improving, with a range of -1 to -11, but mostly in ... , such as game 4 from PT 11 (I shouted some expletives ...
... /july). Anyways, my last PT was a 160 before I ... eras in their studying (ie 1-20, 30s/40s, 50s/ ... of many people using PTs 1-20 solely for drilling, ... and doing (roughly) one PT a day. I thought this ... others are utilizing the different PT eras for studying + what ...
... guys, I just entered the PT phase of my lsat prep ... am planning on taking preptest 1-35 untimed, do blind review ... full length timed test from PT 36. What do you guys ... maybe do untimed from like 1-20? then from 21 move ...