HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| sec3 | 1 | 1 |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 20 | 4.5K | 5.4K |
-
Confusing grammar in this sentenceFrom prep test 1, section 3, question 20, in the middle it states "However, most people consistently perceive small business as a force for good in s…
From prep test 1, section 3, question 20, in the middle it states " ... -
For those of you who finished the CC... How long did it take to BR/fool proof PT 1-35?After finishing the CC, it seems like the thing to do is go through PTs 1-35 fully and THEN start the untouched PTs. Since the study schedule doesn't…
... do is go through PTs 1-35 fully and THEN start ... would be spent on PTs 1-35 (it shows 0 min ... -
Question About Fool ProofingI'm in the process of fool proofing the games from PT 1-35. I'm only on PT 3 but I was wondering if it's ok to watch the explanation first, which is …
... fool proofing the games from PT 1-35. I'm only on ... PT 3 but I was wondering ... -
PT73.S2.Q20 - The advent ofchemical fertilizers ledI know it's a bad idea to argue with LSAT answers, but I find it's the best way to improve - I want to really understand exactly why my thinking is w…
... D is wrong for this question, would love some input ... The arguement is:
1. chem fert caused farmers to ... as chemical fert in question are present in the ... the time to address my question!
... lsat-73-section-2-question-20/ -
PT48.S1.Q20 - Researcher: We have found that some casesHello! This NA question is causing my blood pressure to rise. I have trouble accepting E). Negating E) doesn't destroy the argument. It's okay if…
Hello!
This NA question is causing my blood pressure ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-1-question-20/ -
Just Broke 170!Got a 172 on a practice test this morning! I'm taking the LSAT the 26th of this month so I feel pretty great about that, hopefully I repeat that a fe…
... and drilling all LG from PT 1-35 repeatedly, and fourth overall ... is psychological. There's no question you can't get right. -
Drill by type or SectionCurrently fool proofing 1-35 LG however I want to make sure my LR skills (or lack thereof) are not diminishing. I have saved some problem sets from t…
Currently fool proofing 1-35 LG however I want to make sure my LR skills (or lack thereof) are not diminishing. I have saved some problem sets from the CC but after I finish these should I start from PT#1 and drill by question type or whole sections? -
Should I upgrade to Ultimate+?I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Ultimate+. Here's my dilemma: I have PDF's of each question type (with questions from PT 1-35) and they're a…
... 's of each question type (with questions from PT 1-35) and they ... 'm having difficulty with a question. Also, I find it hard ... mention that I have every PT from 39+ available as well ... -
When should I start drilling?while going through the CC, should I go to the question bank and drill questions from PT 1-16? Or should I drill those questions after i'm done with …
while going through the CC, should I go to the question bank and drill questions from PT 1-16? Or should I drill those questions after i'm done with the CC? Or is there another point of view?? -
LSAT AR LingoWhat does "fully determined" actually mean on the AR section in games? My understanding, from watching the explanation for game 4 in PT 64, question …
... explanation for game 4 in PT 64, question 20, is that "fully determined ... -
PT72.S2.Q16 - There are already more great artworksI am putting this question out there, because after flagging this question and blind reviewing, I still got it wrong. Currently, I am blind reviewin…
... there, because after flagging this question and blind reviewing, I ... br /> My steps:
1. Read question stem
2. Read ... help here clarifying this flaw question.
Admin note: ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description ... -
Bombed LG on PT, 1 month from test dayI bombed this section so so badly. I guessed about 15 questions and I’m pretty sure the ones I “answered” I got wrong. I’m so frustrated because I pr…
... for two days before my PT and was doing so well ... -
PT51.S3.Q20 - Whoever murdered JansenCan someone explain why it's c and not Be? I narrowed it to b and c but chose B because Arg doesn't state that Janson was murdered in his office. I'm…
... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
question-20/ -
PT26.S3.Q20 - Only poetry cannot be translated wellI'm confused by the question stem here: The information above provides the LEAST support for which one of the following? When I read the expla…
I'm confused by the question stem here:
... said this is a MBT question. I thought this was ... a MBT EXCEPT question stem.
https ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description ... /lsat-26-section-3-question-20/ -
HELP! Low Timed Score but High BR Score: How Should I Continue To Study?Hello all! I’m having trouble bringing my timed score up to my BR score. Based on my scores and studying history, how do you guys think I should cont…
... /> Today, I took my first PT since the diagnostic and only ... run out of time around question 20 and am forced to quickly ... -
PT 2 S2 Question 4 Can I infer some people are -P from the statement that most people are P?Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but …
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question? -
HELP I can't understand this question no matter where I look.If someone could help me with this question and show why every AC is wrong and why the right one is right it would be very helpful. PT 2 S2 Questio…
... could help me with this question and show why every AC ... be very helpful.
PT 2 S2 Question 11
"If the ... -
LSAT 69. Section II LR, Question 20Hello 7sagers, Follow my analogy here- (hope it’s clear enough). If the corona virus is among the most common ills, doesn’t that mean that most pe…
... is how I attacked the question. Well not necessarily attacked, considering ... -
PT 18, S4, Q20 Mastery Lesson?Hey fellow 7sagers, Does anyone know whats the **mastery lesson** JY is alluding to in this video explanation: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanation…
... /lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-20/
I'd be very ... -
Trying to nail down LG before Oct flex testHi 7Sagers I'm planning on taking the October Flex but am struggling to improve my LG score. Currently I'm averaging around between 3 to 5 incorre…
... a bit discouraged after taking PT 57 (the section with the ... already taken full practice tests: PT 1-20, and a couple from the ... 20/30/40/50's range ... test. I'm currently drilling PT 21-35 (games only), foolproofing ... -
Question about fool proofing LG target timesIn foolproofing for LG (which I've just started) I've noticed that below the videos, there will be a target time. However, when I watch the videos, J…
... two times?
Example: PT 1 G1:Under 10 in video ... vs. 11:52
Example: PT 1 G2: Around 9 Minutes in ... (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-2-game-2/) -
How can I get faster on LR?Hello everyone, I am struggling to get faster on the logical reasoning section. I usually get to question 16 and guess on the rest of them under time…
... section. I usually get to question 16 and guess on the ... answer, and maybe get like 1-2 from guessing C on ... to get to at least question 20. Any tips on how to ... -
Free Tutoring 2/3/21Hello Everyone! This is the first of a Full LR Tutoring Series. This session will be focusing on Most Strongly Supported Questions, The sessio…
... those struggling with this particular question type however all skill ranges ... will be going over:
(1) MSS Question Stems
(2) How ... />
We will be using PT(S) 19 - 23 for examples ... -
Link to google slides that many have been asking for! I explain my process to -0 LG----> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BP1NnndhE5i6cbuF2GLPetUgzwtr3rUaDfEZuaIJXhE/edit#gid=0 The google sheet I made has every Core curricul…
... trouble: setup, inference, rule, question, ect...
I would start ... do 2 new games from PT 1-35 and as I ... questions excluding the acceptable situation question. Tune your approach to ... .
--start watching/tracking question types that you should look ... -
PT33.S1.Q20 - Recently discovered prehistoric rock paintings...To attack the premise or not to attack the premise I keep hearing over and over again that I'm not supposed to attack the premise but this questio…
... attack the premise but this question from the weakening portion of ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-20/ -
Necessary to fool proof games from 1-35?hi there! i've been seeing some folks on here talk about how they are fool proofing all the games from pt 1-35. i wanted to know if this is really re…
... proofing all the games from pt 1-35. i wanted to know ... getting answers wrong in from pt 50 onwards. appreciate all of ... -
What to do if some sections of a PT are spoiled already?Prior to 7Sage, I used Princeton Review and Khan Academy. Both of these resources did not limit their examples to PT 1-35 like 7Sage did. I've been w…
... not limit their examples to PT 1-35 like 7Sage did. I ... -
PT33.S1.Q20 - I thought we weren't allowed to attack the premises for strengthen/weaken questionsSo this particular question has about 8 years worth of comments and about as much time's worth of confusion regarding why D weakens the argument beca…
So this particular question has about 8 years worth ... Norway to these caves. My question is just how is D ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-20/ -
Just started using 7sage, is there an easier way to drill one question at a time?Hello, I'm wondering if I can drill 1 LR question at a time or one LG at a time. I like to see if I got something correct right away. But from what I…
... wondering if I can drill 1 LR question at a time or ... only drill by adding each question yourself? That just seems like ...
