HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 25 | 2.9K | 3.8K |
-
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I > ... -
"A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ... -
PT12.S4.Q22 - a long-term health studyHey All, So we have this health study that found that people who gained approximately 1 pound per year after the age of 35 tended, on the whole, t…
... of this, please refer to PT C2 Section 3 Question 15 (Deer). I always ... is how I approached this question.
I always plug RRE ... that______?
So with this question what we have at bottom ... -
PT40.S3.Q14 - the only clue I haveGot this one right by POE but had a tough time being OK with A. It is definitely something I considered as a flaw in the reasoning. However, the use …
... I really struggled with this question. Ultimately, like you, POE ... when I showed this question to my father (a ... also go this question quickly. The question has an almost ... these:
-PT C2 Section 3 Question 15
-PT 78 Section 3 Question 7
... -
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
... function.
For PT 46 Section 3 Question 24, are you referring to ... -
"All that is required" Sufficiency or Necessity indicator?I understand that "ALL" is a sufficiency indicator word, and "REQUIRE" is a necessity indicator word. I'm wondering then, what does the phrase "*…
... : EJ-->ROW)
[ PT 15, Section 3, Question 7].
Knowing E ... -
'Best of J.Y. moments:' J.Y.'s video explanations that just make your day.I just came across [this explanation](https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-18/) and I realized how much J.Y.'s humor has ha…
> @TheDeterminedC said:
> I can't remember what question it was, but the commentary on cats was golden. I had tears from that one!!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-3-question-25/
This one? -
'Best of J.Y. moments:' J.Y.'s video explanations that just make your day.I just came across [this explanation](https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-4-question-18/) and I realized how much J.Y.'s humor has ha…
... ; I can't remember what question it was, but the commentary ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-3-question-25/
> This one?
Finding the ConclusionHi all, in this passage, is the conclusion the first sentence?
@BlueRiceCake sorry about that: PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13I do not understand this answercan someone help? I don't see a distinction between both levels of oxygen
hello!
preptest 1 section 3 question 11PTA.S4.Q25 - People's intentions cannot be...Can someone provide an explanation for this question? #help
Hi!
This is my first time using this service, so thank you for clarifying. It is PT A, Section 4, Question 25.The phrase "even if" on LRWhen sentences start with "Even if" or "Even when" or "Even though", I've had a bit of trouble parsing out why LSAT writers put the word "even" there…
... role in the argument? PT 46 section 3 question 24 has even if in ...PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
... regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section 4, question 12. The game ask ... J=5; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and ... O = 1,2,4,5< ... br />
For order choices question 12 ... a factor to answer this question. In addition, the rules ...PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... SO confused about this question. How are you ... equivalent to...."-obtained my Feb 1 OR -less time --> ... format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-03 ...The secret to do tough Weaken/strengthen questionToday I have a big progress in weaken/strengthen question. I find in most weaken/strengthen question, there exists a presumption and the only thing…
... /lsat-37-section-2-question-20/
PT 52 S3 Q19
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question ... PT 52 S1 Q21.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question ... for strengthen/weaken question, we can have ...PT 1-35 as Drills or PTI'm familiar with question types and general approaches to different questions from previous study. I wonder if it makes more sense to do PT 1-35 as …
I'm familiar with question types and general approaches to ... sense to do PT 1-35 as timed 4-section tests, instead of ... wasted the full length tests 1-35. Please let me know ...LSAT Prep Test 32, October, 2000, Section 3, Questions 19-24, Game 4, Rule 2LSAT Prep Test 32 October, 2000 Section 3, Questions 19-24 Game 4 2nd Rule States That G Is In Slot 1, So G Cannot Be In Slot 7. Contrpos…
... />
October, 2000
Section 3, Questions 19-24
1, So G Cannot Be In ... Is Not In Slot 1.
Question: Why Is Not A ... Slot 7, But Not In 1?How useful is the LR from PT 1-16?Hey everyone, So I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found it …
... I am mainly drilling sections PT 1-35 for the next couple ... months before PT stage. I drilled a LR section from PT 1 and found ... it to be really weird. The question ... focusing on 1-16?
Sorry if this question has been ...[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry ... LSAT.
1. Sufficient Assumption
-Supply additional ... with caution.
-PT52, Section 3, Question 11 provides an apt example ... —-> Specific
Question stem: “Of the following, which ...How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... you choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's) or do ... (e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental section)?
PT into experimental sections would be ... loss of a full recent PT.
What do you ...Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What ... to prepare:
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark it ...LR 4/5 Difficulty Q's - more speed and accuracy?Any advice on how to get better at LR 4/5 star difficulty Q's? I'm like -7 for LR (both sections) and almost all of the 7 wrong are all level 4/5 que…
... are also kinda scattered throughout question types.
> >
1 in LR and get these ... up. PT 23, Section 3, #25 - this is one example of a question that is ... do more drilling on those question types.
Yea i ...PT31.S2.Q19 - "If the flowers Drew received..."**#help** **Question link:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-19/ Ok, I'm all on board with the correct answer an…
... the previous PT (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-25/), it ... rather b/c:
-1- (D) is not presenting us ... eliminate there--and
-3- the conclusion, as bad as ...A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home ... Part-time jobs.
3. Do not go home ... take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No ...A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home ... Part-time jobs.
3. Do not go home ... take the contrapositive of 3, we have "No ...Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> I've got a common question about linking up a logic ... precisely the answer to my question. Any help is appreciated!
My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According to ...PT 1.S1.Q26 (P4) - outside the medical professionhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/ I'm reviewing RC heavy, and I got stuck on this question, specifically an…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-1-section-1-passage-4-questions/
... I got stuck on this question, specifically answer choice A (I ...PT 26 - "susceptible to proof" meaningHey all, What does the phrase "susceptible to proof" mean? The context is an answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the argument i…
... answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the ... ."
This is Section 3, Question 10, PT 26 for your reference.
PT47.S3.Q19 - although high cholesterol levels (wording question)http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/ When you encounter the word "contributes" on the LSAT, do you take this to be a "c…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/
When you encounter ... always have assumed so, but PT 47, S3, Q19 threw me ...63.3.2 Artist: Almost everyoneI got this question correct (D was the flaw I anticipated), but during the exam and BR, I couldn't come up with a reason to eliminate E. According t…
I got this question correct (D was the flaw ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-02/
Almost everyone ... have to wake up until 1:00) vs. making a "living ...
