Why is "only very careful drivers use headlights when their use is not legally required" the answer here? I literally can't bend my mind to figure out why that changes anything after the headlight law went into effect and the resulting lack of collision ...
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
> @thisissparta said:
> Your numbering might be off. Question 14 appears to be an Argument Part question. Is that the one that you're referring to?
> Hey. Sorry about that I meant to put PT 27.5 S1.Q14
I'm reviewing RC heavy, and I got stuck on this question, specifically answer choice A (I'm using the Pithypike plan, where I'm doing RC untimed in the 1st month). Now ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-14/
I am having problems understanding why that AP is the conclusion. Structurally, I understand that it is the conclusion (because of the conclusion indicator 'but'). However, the ...
... that we are going through PT 17-35 to extract the ... loose selection of questions from PT10-35 making up the problem ... pretty much every question from PT 17-35 (way more questions ...
I remain unconvinced, and still think (C) is a better answer!
Answer (C) does not say that the nesting boxes are smaller, but just that they provide less space for eggs (because they get overcrowded). In my view, the given statements support ...