Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?
I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule here)"? I don't know how to approach these at all.
... JY's explanation for PT 89.S2.Q3 he talks about the ... question like this from a PT? I would like to see ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-89-section-2-question-03/
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT :joy:
... :
PT17.S2.Q11(★); PT22.S4.Q21(★★★); PT23.S2.Q19(★★★★); PT23.S3 ... (★★★★★); PT64.S1.Q24 (★★★★); PT67.S2.Q09 (★★); PT68.S3.Q21 (★★★★★); ... now but something like PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★) may be a ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-2-question-11/
I chose E instead of A, and still don't see why A could support the argument better. Can anybody explain that to me? Thanks.
Sooooo, I just did Pt 27 S2 G2 which is the lizards ... means that each habitat has 2 slots, but how do we ... rule just states MAX 2 PER SLOT? Max 2 does not mean ... every habitat has 2 slots. Also, during the exam ...
2) The author’s attitude toward ... author seems to have 2 polar opposite attitudes regarding authoritarian ... discuss the similarities between the 2. Because of this the ... discuss the differences between the 2. This answer choice is ...