HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.5K |
| 29 | 603 | 695 |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 1 | 27K | 40.7K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 20 | 4.4K | 5.4K |
-
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
Hi ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-21/
this ... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS's ... -
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... to the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ... -
PT 29.S2.P1 - for some years before the outbreak of world war 1https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage Hi everyone - I'm currently working on Reading Comprehension and am work…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage
Hi ... 35, an art passage from PT 29 is dissected.
My ... -
In case anyone wanted to know which LG from PT 1-35 are taught in CC...PT 1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game 2 PT 4: Game 2 PT 5: PT 6: PT 7: PT 8: PT 9: Game 2 PT 10: PT 11: PT 12: Game 3 PT 13: PT 14: PT …
...
PT 5:
PT 6:
PT 7:
PT 8:
PT 9 ...
PT 13:
PT 14:
PT 15:
PT 16: Game 1, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 20: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 29: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game ... -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
... LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... .** note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
June Test-Takers, Week of Dec. 14th: Wed (PT 29), Sat (Workshop-RC Question Types) Sat (PT 30)<img src="http://mittromneycentral.com/uploads/june-3.jpg"> </center> June Test Takers! We’ve got 6 months, so let’s make them count by getting o…
... Dec. 16th at 8PM ET: PT 29
Click here to join ...
Note: these tests (PTs 29-35) are part of the ... by taking an actual PT without having to use ... the curriculum to do this PT, BR it and then ... /> For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried. -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What to do to prepare:
Complete PT ... 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
Madison -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
To add to this list - #20 part to whole flaw: PT 62, Sec 2, Q 7. -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading ... -
PT 29/ Section 1/ Question 8Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written?
Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written? -
When do we know "in other cases" can be helpful or not?Hi, I thought "other cases" are alwas irrelevant to the case discussed in the stimulus... I thought "yes, maybe that happens in this case, but ma…
... /> But for example in PT 71 Sec 1 Q12...the correct answer is ... -
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-10/ -
Context Indicators?So, I thought the words: But, although, and However introduce context. But, a lot of the MP/MC that I've done use these words as premise indicators. …
... .
For Example, PT 40, Sec 1, Q9.
Do these ... -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
How to approach "most logically completes" LR questionsDoes anyone have a specific strategy for these? They seem to be cropping up more often, and I usually do it by gut instinct, which is fine with easy …
... having issue with is PT 74, sec 4, Q 7. I didn't ... -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ... -
Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiencyI'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... . That question is: Pt 51 Section 1 Question 20. That is the only ... to do beyond or BR PT 56.
In my ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
... to Answer Choice E in PT 38 Sec 1 Q20. I am not ... -
From my experience: The Four Pillars of LG ConsistencyI started studying for the LSAT barely able to answer a single question on games. With no training in logic, I essentially had to start from the gro…
... " in the answer choices like PT 29 game 1 question 6) is that ... possibly appear: it is either 1. something we have discovered MBT ... shows up: from PT 7 game 3 through PT 72 game 4 ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25 ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
>
& ... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25 ...
