HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 46 | 228 | 257 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
-
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
Only....ifIs it ok to translate "Writing can *only* succeed *if* it meets the expectations." as: "Meet Expectation --> Succeed" or Is it "Succeed --> …
... (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-2-question-02/) says:
> ... this sentence using the Group 2 rule, I think it would ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... of the members could be...?**" (2)
👉 If the question ... /> The difference between (1) and (2) is subtle but actually pretty ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... /> -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25 -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... separated from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding B ... can help us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
PT92.S2.Q21 (G4) - Why wouldn't F's commercial be first?Why isn't "FIGHK" possible? I think the answer should be C instead of E, help, I am loosing it... **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the form…
I assume this is PT 92 - Section 2 - Game 4? Which question are you referencing?Suppose the condition "" was replaced with Tips?Does anyone have any tips for these questions? I tend to have to work through each answer choice to see if it would have a similar effect to the remo…
... a good example for this (PT 69, Section 2, Game 3, Question 17 ... just cross out 1 or 2 answer choices right off the ...The phrase "even if" on LRWhen sentences start with "Even if" or "Even when" or "Even though", I've had a bit of trouble parsing out why LSAT writers put the word "even" there…
... a role in the argument? PT 46 section 3 question 24 has even ...PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
... or comment regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section 4, question 12. ... understand this except for N = 2. With L = 4, that ... =5; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and O = ... 1,2,4,5
< ... scenario do not include N = 2.
Thank you ...Strange tech glitch on PT - Need help ASAPHey! I am having a strange technical glitch on a prep test I just finished (PT 46). After I completed the timed test I went back to complete the BR. …
... prep test I just finished (PT 46). After I completed the ... the bubbles. This occurred on section 2 LR (q21-25) and on ... section 4 LG (q 9-22 ... possible because I finished each section with time to spare ... a few hours on this PT and would like to ...PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
... section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT ... on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly ... on section 3. What are your ... experiences with this PT?Superprep 2 PTHas anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
Has anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... re trying to organize some 2-3-Hour interactive workshops ... that info in the comments section. It’s all new, ... LSAT BR Group PT 42
Tues Feb 2, 2016 5pm ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 46
Sat Feb 13, ... LSAT BR Group PT 60
Sat Apr 2, 2016 5 ...PT 29.S2.P1 - for some years before the outbreak of world war 1https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage Hi everyone - I'm currently working on Reading Comprehension and am work…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage
Hi ... 35, an art passage from PT 29 is dissected.
PT June 2007.S2.Q24 - car companies solicit consumer informationI have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patt…
... symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would ... if this is a free PT! You can see the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-24[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... seemed as if it presented 2 necessary conditions for the book ... year -
1. important;
2. well written.
I ...Question: Cambridge PT 5th Section (PT-A)?I just found a copy of PT74 I bought from CambridgeLSAT awhile ago. It looks like it's got 5 sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the …
... sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the Answer ... to indicate whether this section came from another PT.
Are ...Drilling LR from old PTI am recently taking LR from old PTs(1-20) in order to boost my score on this section. My maximum score is 159 but it fluctuates a lot. I sometimes s…
... boost my score on this section. My maximum score is 159 ... scoring 156 on PT 46. I realized that my LR section score fluctuates ... test - which is 64% per section. I am not sure if ...PT 59 - wtf happened to my score???I recently took PT 59. I've been scoring in the low to mid-160s, but this time it dropped to 156. I suppose a 4ish point drop isn't that big of a de…
I recently took PT 59.
I've been ... away)
On Sec 2 (LR), I got 6 answers ... 't perform like this on Section 2. Maybe I was tired especially ... hitting Section 3 (but usually this doesn ...[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
... try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 ... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... br /> 11/18 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/19 ... br /> 11/21 Monday - Section 2 - RC
11/22 ... br /> 11/25 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/26 ...PT 80 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, it was a lot of fun [Blind Reviewing PT 79](https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/9414/ended-pt-79-blind-review-with-j-y-multiple-se…
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... Session
3/28 Tuesday - Section 2 - RC
7:30p - 10 ... Sessions
3/5 Sunday - Section 1 - LR
3/6 ... /> 3/18 Saturday - Section 4 - LR
3/27 Monday - Section 2 - RCPT 80 Blind Review | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 80 (December 2016 LSAT). I'm holding 9 sessions total. 3 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session wi…
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... - LR
5/20 Saturday - Section 2 - RC, Passages 1 and 3 ...
5/23 Tuesday - Section 2 - RC, Passages 2 and 4
5 ... /> 5/25 Thursday - Section 4 - LR
5/26 Friday - Section 2 - RCPT 81 BR Sessions with J.Y.Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... Sessions
8/26 Saturday - Section 2 - LR
8/27 ... , Passages 1 and 2
8/29 Tuesday - Section 2 - LR
... /> 9/1 Friday - Section 2 - LR
9/2 Saturday - Section 3 - LR
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's ... e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental ... section)?
I ... breaking up a recent PT into experimental sections would ... loss of a full recent PT.
What ...Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... both
Example: PT 46 Q 22
"Over the ... https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-3-question-22/
... /lsat-31-section-2-question-03/
PT 34 #13 ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-2-question-13/
1st PT Post-CC: 160, 178 BR advice/next steps?I just finished BR for my 1st PT Post-CC, scores below (planning on taking the September 2018 test): Raw Score: 160, BR: 178 LG: -9, -0 LR: -10,…
... finished BR for my 1st PT Post-CC, scores below (planning ... this being my first timed pt (and having not done ANYTHING ... the end of the section. Heading into section 2 (LR), I was still ... this is only my first pt and isnt necessarily indicative of ...
