... B, and C 4) That there is indeed a ... A/B/C 4) There's no relationship 4 of the last list ( ... that B is basically doing #4 from the first list: ...
@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.
... day parlance: check out PT 39-4-19 for an example of ... example of this: check out PT 27 section4 Question 20. Here we ... have a cross-section of several lesson ...
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section4 Question 19. While I started ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section4 question 20.
... right. The older tests (PT 1-PT 20) are really good for ... the sufficient/necessary flaw on PT A section4 question 20 mean? Suggestion ... from the remaining.