There aren't, because JY only uses old LSATs for the problem sets, to leave all the recent ones pristine for full length PT practice. The comparative passages were introduced in PT52, and the problem sets use PT 1-38ish.
I started drilling this week utilizing LG sections from PT52, 53, and 54. I either get lost with my board set up or I get lost attempted to make inferences and split my boards. Something always goes awry.
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ...
That's very impressive! Which prep test have you taken so far?(e.g., pt52-71) If it were more earlier ones(pre-70), I'm positive that there is a lot of rooms for improvement.
... ; > So I'm at PT 39. What do you think ... on 62-81 and use 52-61 for timed section. That ... week, foolproof LG (PT 1-35), and use 52-61 as timed ... and every game on every PT/Section I take. Exposure to ... feel compelled to do every PT) 52-61 as timed sections that ...
... some for drilling and full PT).
>
> At ... />
But to answer your question, PT52 and onward are what most ... of the comparative passages from PT52 and onward. Also, correct answers ...
... the conditional sequencing game in PT 83,- JY decided not to ... , he did decide to split (PT 73 game 1). JY is ... I pointed out -- PT61 and PT52 Game 2, my issue is ...
Alex and friends (especially to my tag team partner Victoria), I will be taking a break this week to focus on drilling on my weaknesses. I will be back for PT52!