I got it right. But I don't know why J.Y said we can can make "some" statement by contrapositive. The relationship is about "all" statement.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-2-question-23/
Any idea?
... 's post, lol). Section one went somewhat well, section2 went fine, I ... tanked section 3 (which was ... the experimental...woohoo!), section 4 went "okay," and, section 5 (LG)...well ...
I'm confused why the arrow splits for PT 22 GAME 4 RULE 4 and the arrow doesn't split for PT 31 GAME 2 RULE 4 even though they both contain the words NEITHER NOR.
I thought the arrow can't be split for NEITHER NOR statements.
... more game changing. In my PT 22, Section 4, Question 14, answer ... experienced a difference between their PT's language and what 7sage ... ? I'm not worried my PT's are severely messed up ...
2) even if we were to ... degree in the success), and 2. why a college degree was ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-2-question-09/ (see from the ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-3-question-20/
... Violent crimes are rare 2. Premise2: Newspapers are likely to ... : Crimes are rare 2. Conclusion: Therefore, it is not ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-2-question-09/ (see from ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-08/
I can't see why (E) is wrong. Could anyone explain why (D) is right?? Appreciate in advance
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-04/
... this was supported by line 2-4. Wouldn't "word processors ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-2-passage-4-passage/
https ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-2-passage-4-questions/