HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.5K |
| 68 | 348 | 406 |
| section | 23.2K | 38.1K |
| 2 | 23.6K | 33.3K |
-
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include:< ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback ... -
PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... 'd actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges ... -
Panda's guide to answer all SA, PSA, Strengthen and WeakenHi Guys, I think I have spent a lot of effort in coming this up and I want to share with you my hypothesis to see what you guys think about this …
... SA questions. For example: PT 68, Sec 2 Question 23 was, at the ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... of the members could be...?**" (2)
👉 If the question ... /> The difference between (1) and (2) is subtle but actually pretty ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... /> -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25 -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... separated from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding B ... can help us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
PT92.S2.Q21 (G4) - Why wouldn't F's commercial be first?Why isn't "FIGHK" possible? I think the answer should be C instead of E, help, I am loosing it... **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the form…
I assume this is PT 92 - Section 2 - Game 4? Which question are you referencing?New Study GroupHello everyone! I recently just restarted studying for the LSAT and I am looking to form a study group that meets a few times a week, Monday-Thurs…
Hey guys, I had asked yall a question regarding pt 68 LR 2 question 24. I figured out my mistake but if yall wanted to go over it I can discuss it, its actually really simple now that I've figured it out.Suppose the condition "" was replaced with Tips?Does anyone have any tips for these questions? I tend to have to work through each answer choice to see if it would have a similar effect to the remo…
... a good example for this (PT 69, Section 2, Game 3, Question 17 ... just cross out 1 or 2 answer choices right off the ...Delete.Delete.
... give you more context, pt. 68 s.2 q.24's stimulus claims ...PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
... section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT ... on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly ... on section 3. What are your ... experiences with this PT?Superprep 2 PTHas anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
Has anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... trying to organize some 2-3-Hour interactive workshops ... that info in the comments section. It’s all new, ... LSAT BR Group PT 42
Tues Feb 2, 2016 5pm ... LSAT BR Group PT 60
Sat Apr 2, 2016 5 ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 68
Sat Apr 30, ...Feedback on PT schedule for June?Just set up a schedule and would appreciate some feedback. Made sure to take 2-3 tests per week, and on the weeks I take 3 to include one retake to h…
... . Made sure to take 2-3 tests per week, ... /> April 6- PT 40
April 10- PT 55
... /> April 14- PT 45
April 17- PT 73
April ... /> April 25- PT 50
April 27- PT 68
May 1 ... - PT 60
May ...PT 29.S2.P1 - for some years before the outbreak of world war 1https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage Hi everyone - I'm currently working on Reading Comprehension and am work…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage
Hi ... 35, an art passage from PT 29 is dissected.
PT June 2007.S2.Q24 - car companies solicit consumer informationI have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patt…
... symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would ... if this is a free PT! You can see the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-24[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... seemed as if it presented 2 necessary conditions for the book ... year -
1. important;
2. well written.
I ...Question: Cambridge PT 5th Section (PT-A)?I just found a copy of PT74 I bought from CambridgeLSAT awhile ago. It looks like it's got 5 sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the …
... sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the Answer ... to indicate whether this section came from another PT.
Are ...PT 59 - wtf happened to my score???I recently took PT 59. I've been scoring in the low to mid-160s, but this time it dropped to 156. I suppose a 4ish point drop isn't that big of a de…
I recently took PT 59.
I've been ... away)
On Sec 2 (LR), I got 6 answers ... 't perform like this on Section 2. Maybe I was tired especially ... hitting Section 3 (but usually this doesn ...[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
... try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 ... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... br /> 11/18 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/19 ... br /> 11/21 Monday - Section 2 - RC
11/22 ... br /> 11/25 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/26 ...
