PT 17.3.4
Yes! ... sure if the question below (PT 17. 3. 4) showcases "how ... question from rather an old PT, but I think the skill ... was definitely a good early PT question to look at for ... , we just finished review of PT73 and those point at issue ...
... to poop on a particular PT because it sucks and ... LSAT's remarkably similar from PT to PT and learning to recognize ... didn't do well on PT73. Now you get to figure ... you can do well on PT whatever whose score will ... what you're saying about 73.1.6. The argument has ...
Thanks @J.Y. Ping, i wanna just add that PT73 knocked my socks off abit and i spent close to a week shoring up the weaknesses it exposed and my average went up
By a 2 points!!!, i owe this all to having a hard PT...THANK YOU PT73!!!
... the conditional sequencing game in PT 83,- JY decided not to ... , he did decide to split (PT73 game 1). JY is not ... I pointed out -- PT61 and PT 52 Game 2, my issue ...
... have been doing 1 PT per day and simply attempting ... Day 11: PT 4, 10 and 11
Day 12: PT 5, 11 ... , and 12
Day 13: PT 6, 12, and ... 13
Day 14: PT 7, 13 ... until...
Week 12
Day 34: PT 31, 33, 34 ...
... seen them during the actual PT, so it's not ideal ... CC, but my highest PT was +12 and I was averaging at ... needed to break into that +12 realm consistently.
Hmm, I had a different experience. 171 on PT73 and 166 on PT 72. 169 on PT 74. I'm still getting used to the subtle changes in the late 60s and 70s as well as the dual passage in RC.