HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 79 | 426 | 505 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 25 | 2.9K | 3.8K |
-
PT30.S4.Q25 - The judgment that an artist is greatCan anyone help me out with this one? Is it safe to say that this stimulus is flawed because it's calling a good line of reasoning bad? #help http…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-25/
**Admin note: edited URL ... -
difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... as a trap when the question stem asks for a necessary ... , PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question ... -
PT74.S4.Q25 - Of the citizens who disapprove of the prime minister'sCan someone explain this to me? This is a pfmr question but the answer looks like a contrapositive based on JY's explanation. For some reason I can't…
... me? This is a pfmr question but the answer looks like ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-4-question-25/ -
PT61.S4.Q25 - Individual Freedom and Social IntegrityHello! I am having trouble with when to chain statements and when to not. I am doing PT61.S4.Q25 Stimulus: There can be no individual freedom with…
... social integrity.
My question:
Do I chain the ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-4-question-25/ -
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You ... very relevant to answering the question, though not absolutely necessary.
PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"** -
"Some" in strengthen-weaken questionsHi Everyone! **This seems to be a recurring theme in several LR questions, so perhaps worth considering.** When attacking a support (premise to co…
... /> **Take for example the below question on proto-indo-european languages ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-1-question-16/**
Here ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-25/**
Any thoughts welcome ... -
PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20? -
PTB.S4.Q25 - Where is the conclusion?Can someone help me find the conclusion in this passage? Its prep test B section 4 question 25.
Can someone help me find the conclusion in this passage? Its prep test B section 4 question 25. -
Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
... . One particular question that shows this logic is PT 66 Section 4 Question 12.
PT 70 S4 Q25Can someone please explain the correct answer?
Have you seen J.Y.'s video on it yet?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-4-question-25/Difference in degree in answer choice should be compatible with stim: 38 LR2 #25Stim says: European music is sophisticated because it's intelligible The choice D says: unintelligibility and "most" sophisticated music is correl…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-38-section-4-question-25/
@lschoolgo This was tough ...Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... annoyed if you ask a question that has already been asked ... before I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ..."A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ...About "without" It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes it is negate ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.Does anyone have any NA advice to make it clickI am scoring somewhere between -4 to -6 on LR now (yesterday I had a -11 but I was frenzied and used the "5" setting on the 7sage proctor when I alre…
... day parlance: check out PT 39-4-19 for an example ... of this: check out PT 27 section 4 Question 20. Here we have ... a cross-section of several lesson ... lesson. A necessary assumption question that has an assumption that ...What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started scrambling ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ...PT38.S4.Q25 - one reason why european musicI am so confused by the video explanation on this one. At 1:27 the video says that an answer choice is "totally compatible to the statement above bec…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-38-section-4-question-25/
As for your ... question, if one situation has nothing ...PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.How to do flaw q when you can't see the flaw/prephaseI know JY advises against moving onto the ACs without coming up with a prephase for flaw questions, but there are unfortunately usually 2-3 flaw ques…
... right. The older tests (PT 1-PT 20) are really good for ... the sufficient/necessary flaw on PT A section 4 question 20 mean? Suggestion #1 ... the remaining.
4.Drill that question after and eliminate that ...Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
Hey again,
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer choice ... well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we might ...Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
> ... The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we might ...[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
... focus on only one section of PT 79. All sessions will ...
11/19 Saturday - Section 4 - LR
11/20 ... Section 4 - LR
11/23 Wednesday - Section 1 - LR
11/25 Friday - Section ... 2 - RC
11/26 Saturday - Section 4 - ...PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the ... 2nd LR section will not be ... won't be doing every question on the test, just those ... />
**UPDATE: PT69 section 4 LR (second LR section) BR call - Wednesday, March ...[End] Feb Study Group | PT 79 | Thursday, January 26 | 12 pm ESTLet's bring some magic for the final countdown to February 4. http://uproxx.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/gob-trick.gif?w=650 Hope to hear you th…
... the final countdown to February 4.
http://uproxx.files ... , 2016 - PT 79 (please note the date change from 1/25)
12pm ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ...PT 25.S4.Q06 - the male sage grouse has air sacsHey, guys! I'm having trouble understanding why B is incorrect. My reasoning for selecting B was that if the diseased male grouse were treated with …
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-4-question-06/Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT :joy:
Here is ... .Q25 (★★★★) may be a good question to review.
